메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
조준희 (애머스트 대학교)
저널정보
한국서양사연구회 서양사연구 서양사연구 제57호
발행연도
2017.1
수록면
117 - 152 (36page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This article examines how Norbert Elias and History interacted and appropriated each other to consider the relationship between theory and history. Though Elias is now considered one of the major social theorist of the twentieth century, it was among historians that he first gained recognition and influence. After his rejection of Neo-Kantian philosophy, Elias turned to sociology and drew on history to create his own social theory. During the 1930s, Elias first wrote Court Society as a work of “intensive” history and then completed his magnum opus The Process of Civilization as a study of “sociogenesis and psychogenesis” across centuries. In the 1970s, historians belatedly “discovered” Elias, welcoming him as a precursor and guide to new trends in social and cultural history, while remaining skeptical of his notion of “state formation” and investigating alternate causations. In turn, Elias himself focused much of his later works on elaborating and expanding his theories of “figuration”, “interdependencies”, and “processes”, while historians sought to draw on his theoretical implications without adhering to his grand narrative of “civilization.” The intersecting and diverging of Elias and historians show how theory and history can inform and strengthen each other without necessarily converging.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0