Single-flap versus double-flap approach for periodontal pocket reduction in supraosseous defects: a comparative study

Venkata Lakshmi Mathala; Santosh Venkata Ramesh Konathala; Naga Venkata Satya Sruthima Gottumukkala; Mohan Kumar Pasupuleti; Vivek Bypalli; Radharani Korukonda

추천

검색

자료유형: 학술저널

저자정보: Venkata Lakshmi Mathala (Department of Periodontics Vishnu Dental College) Santosh Venkata Ramesh Konathala (Department of Periodontics Vishnu Dental College) Naga Venkata Satya Sruthima Gottumukkala (Department of Periodontics Vishnu Dental College) Mohan Kumar Pasupuleti (Department of Periodontics Vishnu Dental College) Vivek Bypalli (Department of Periodontics Vishnu Dental College) Radharani Korukonda (Department of Periodontics Vishnu Dental College)

저널정보: 대한치주과학회 Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science 제51권 제4호

발행연도: 2021.1

수록면: 239 - 253 (15page)

이용수

📌

연구주제

📖

연구배경

🔬

연구방법

🏆

연구결과

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기

Purpose: The single-flap approach (SFA) is a minimally invasive technique with limited mucoperiosteal flap elevation to gain access to the buccal/palatal aspects, thus limiting post-surgical complications. The purpose of the present study was to gain insights into the impact of the SFA over the double-flap approach (DFA) on periodontal flap treatment outcomes and patient compliance in terms of discomfort and time taken for surgical procedures. Methods: Twenty patients with persistent probing pocket depths of ≥5 mm were scheduled for the SFA (test site) and for the DFA (control site). All the clinical periodontal parameters were recorded at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Radiographic bone level (cone-beam computed tomography) was evaluated at baseline and 6 months. Patients' postoperative pain perception and wound healing were also assessed. Results: The SFA showed a significant reduction in periodontal pocket depth, gain in clinical attachment level (CAL), and gain in bone level when compared with the DFA. The SFA substantially improved wound healing and induced less postoperative pain than the DFA. Conclusions: The SFA resulted in substantial improvement in the composite outcome measures, as shown by a reduction in pocket depth with minimal gingival recession, gain in CAL, early wound healing, less postoperative discomfort, and better patient-centered outcomes.

#Minimally invasive surgery #Periodontal disease #Periodontal pocket #Single flap approach #Wound healing

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

참고문헌이 DBpia에서 서비스 중이라면, [참고문헌 신청]을 통해 등록해보세요

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!