메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김진형 (가야대학교) 권영우 (영남대학교)
저널정보
한국체육과학회 한국체육과학회지 한국체육과학회지 제30권 제5호 (자연과학 편)
발행연도
2021.10
수록면
839 - 846 (8page)
DOI
10.35159/kjss.2021.10.30.5.839

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to observe whether there is a difference in arterial stiffness according to age difference. A total of 24 women under 40 years of age were selected for this study and consisted of high(mean age 18.7years) and low(mean age 35.8years) age groups. Measurement items were baPWV, ABI, and extremity blood pressure. As a result of the measurement the following results were obtained. The baPWV of the right upper arm and right ankle showed a higher trend in those in their high age groups than those in their low age groups but there was no significant difference. The baPWV of the left upper arm and left ankle also tended to be higher in those in their high age groups than in their low age groups but there was no significant difference. In the case of ABI, both the right and the left showed a higher trend in those in their high age groups than those in their low age groups, but there was no significant difference. In the left-right comparison of blood pressure by extremity the systolic blood pressure of the right arm was higher than that of the left arm and the systolic pressure of the left ankle was higher than that of the right ankle but there are no significant different. In the comparison according to upper extremity and lower extremities both systolic and diastolic blood pressures showed that the lower extremity systolic blood pressure was significantly higher than the upper extremity systolic blood pressure, But extremity blood pressure did not show any difference according to age difference indicating that there was no arterial stiffness difference between the high age groups and low age groups.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 결과
Ⅳ. 논의
Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언
참고문헌

참고문헌 (20)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-692-002155253