지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article analyzes the competition of naval power between the U.S. and Japan before the outbreak of the Pacific War in the early 20th century. Japan, which emerged as a new maritime power in Asia in the early 20th century, began to seek hegemony in the Pacific region, whereas the United States, which sought to maintain the status quo in the Pacific region, recognized Japan"s move as a challenge to the United States.
The U.S.-Japan competition, which took place in the Pacific region, developed into a naval superiority competition, and eventually the Pacific War broke out in 1941. The naval power competition between the two countries raised the question of how to operate naval forces in Asia-Pacific, which developed into a maritime strategy competition between Japan"s “interception-attrition strategy” and the U.S. war plan “Orange” -> war plan “Rainbow" against Japan.
After the end of World War I, Japan became the first Asian maritime power and advanced to the South Pacific ocean. Japan joined the Washington regime in 1922, but considered the U.S. as the first virtual enemy and continued to build submarines, landing ships, and auxiliary ships which were exceptional maritime arsenals from the treaty. After terminating from the Treaty of Washington in 1936, Japan continued to strengthen its naval capabilities and developing a maritime strategy(interception-attrition strategy).
Meanwhile, the U.S. began to recognize Japan as an official potential enemy in the 20th century, and developed an orange plan against Japan. The real perception of Japan"s threat came as Japan"s withdraw from Washington Treaty(1936). In 1938, the U.S. began building up its naval capabilities through the Vinson-Tramel Act to enhance its naval power, and responded to Japan"s naval capabilities. The U.S. won over Japan in the maritime strategic level.
The U.S.-Japan competition, which took place in the Pacific region, developed into a naval superiority competition, and eventually the Pacific War broke out in 1941. The naval power competition between the two countries raised the question of how to operate naval forces in Asia-Pacific, which developed into a maritime strategy competition between Japan"s “interception-attrition strategy” and the U.S. war plan “Orange” -> war plan “Rainbow" against Japan.
After the end of World War I, Japan became the first Asian maritime power and advanced to the South Pacific ocean. Japan joined the Washington regime in 1922, but considered the U.S. as the first virtual enemy and continued to build submarines, landing ships, and auxiliary ships which were exceptional maritime arsenals from the treaty. After terminating from the Treaty of Washington in 1936, Japan continued to strengthen its naval capabilities and developing a maritime strategy(interception-attrition strategy).
Meanwhile, the U.S. began to recognize Japan as an official potential enemy in the 20th century, and developed an orange plan against Japan. The real perception of Japan"s threat came as Japan"s withdraw from Washington Treaty(1936). In 1938, the U.S. began building up its naval capabilities through the Vinson-Tramel Act to enhance its naval power, and responded to Japan"s naval capabilities. The U.S. won over Japan in the maritime strategic level.
목차
1. 서론
2. 해양강국 일본의 등장
3. 일본의 對美 해양전략 : 차단·소모(邀擊漸減, interception-attrition) 전략
4. 미국의 對日 해양전략 : 오렌지(Orange)·레인보우(Rainbow) 계획
5. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (50)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
‘언론’ 관련 용어의 의미와 쓰임에 관한 한국과 일본의 차이
한국언론정보학보
2021 .12
-
战后日本国家大战略与日朝关系
동북아연구(구 통일문제연구)
2016 .08
-
Time to Worry, Mate? The Construction of Maritime Security Perceptions Down Under
Pacific Focus
2017 .01
-
일본은 어떻게 태평양 경제통합의 주도적 국가가 되었는가?: 전후 대외경제전략의 유산을 중심으로
Journal of Global and Area Studies
2023 .03
-
US-Japan-Korea Co-operation : Where Next?
Global Asia
2017 .03
-
Completing the U.S.-Japan-Korea Alliance Triangle: Prospects and Issues in Japan-Korea Security Cooperation
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2016 .01
-
Japan’s Changing Vision of a Free and Open Indo-Pacific
Global Asia
2019 .03
-
김정은 정권의 대일 접근과 북일관계
국제정치연구
2016 .12
-
Comparison of U.S., Japan and EU’s Indo-Pacific Strategies, with a Focus on Development Cooperation
IFANS PERSPECTIVES
2022 .03
-
냉전기 太平洋지역 美·蘇간 해군력 경쟁 : 해양지정학의 인식 변화를 중심으로
군사
2017 .09
-
Helping the US Lead Again: Japan’s Vision of a Free and Open Indo-Pacific
Global Asia
2021 .03
-
서태평양에서의 미중 세력 경쟁과 자위대의 역할 확대
국방연구
2015 .12
-
Living among the Elephants: South Korea and Japan’s Response to the U.S.–China Maritime Rivalry in the Asia–Pacific
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2017 .01
-
Japan’s Semiconductor Strategy and Implications for Korea
[KIEP] KIEP Opinions
2022 .09
-
日本の新しい安全保障⋅防衛戦略: 拒否戦略を通じた競争戦略の体系
일본연구논총
2023 .06
-
일본 아시아전략의 진화와 인도-태평양: ‘아시아의 지역화’와 ‘지역화 속 아시아’
국제정치연구
2022 .09
-
미중 전략경쟁 시기의 한일관계: 양극화된 정치와 대일정책
일본연구논총
2022 .12
-
신냉전과 미중 인도·태평양 해양안보 경쟁
국제.지역연구
2025 .03
-
미국의 아시아태평양 해양안보전략 분석 및 영향
동북아연구(구 통일문제연구)
2016 .08
-
US-Japan-India: Risks and Rewards In the Indo-Pacific
Global Asia
2020 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
공군, 제17회 항공우주법 세미나 개최 : ‘미래 항공우주작전 역량 발전을 위한 법적 과제’ 주제로 공군의 항공우주작전능력 향상 방안 모색
편집부
국방과 기술
2021
.12
공군, 항공우주군 도약 위한 ‘공군본부 우주센터’ 신설 : 국내 · 외 기관과 효과적인 협업을 통한 우주역량 강화
편집부
국방과 기술
2021
.11
육군 우주력 발전 기본방향과 함의
송세찬
,
이준왕
한국항공우주학회 학술발표회 초록집
2021
.07
해군, 제15회 국제해양력심포지엄 개최 : 미래 해양안보전략과 해군력 발전 방향, 항모의 군사적 유용성과 역할 등 논의
편집부
국방과 기술
2021
.10
육군 우주력 발전방향
김종범
항공우주산업기술동향
2021
.07
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-390-001838749