지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Objectives : This research evaluate the level of construction waste materials in Iraq construction industry and compare construction material waste among three type of executing projects including specialist contractors, general building contractor and government department.
Methods : The target materials in this study were brick, cement, sand, steel, gravel and thermo-stone. SPSS V24. Descriptive and inferential analyses were applied in this study.
Results and Discussion : Field observation show that the highest percentage of waste was “Brick” with 15.21% followed by “Sand” with 12.52% and “Thermo-stone” with 12.02%. The lowest percentage of waste In Iraq construction project was “Steel” and “Cement” with 3.96% and 4% respectively. The results of a comparison between these three groups confirmed that for all types of construction project waste, the governmental project had the highest percentage (12.77%), special contractor (11.19%), a general building contractor (9.71%). The major waste from materials was handling with 31.9%, concrete construction with 28.09% and 24.26% the finishing.
Conclusion : The percentage of losses in the construction sites is very high compared to the permissible limit implementing inexpensive preventive measures, mostly related to managerial practice improvements.
Methods : The target materials in this study were brick, cement, sand, steel, gravel and thermo-stone. SPSS V24. Descriptive and inferential analyses were applied in this study.
Results and Discussion : Field observation show that the highest percentage of waste was “Brick” with 15.21% followed by “Sand” with 12.52% and “Thermo-stone” with 12.02%. The lowest percentage of waste In Iraq construction project was “Steel” and “Cement” with 3.96% and 4% respectively. The results of a comparison between these three groups confirmed that for all types of construction project waste, the governmental project had the highest percentage (12.77%), special contractor (11.19%), a general building contractor (9.71%). The major waste from materials was handling with 31.9%, concrete construction with 28.09% and 24.26% the finishing.
Conclusion : The percentage of losses in the construction sites is very high compared to the permissible limit implementing inexpensive preventive measures, mostly related to managerial practice improvements.
목차
1. Introduction
2. Causes of construction waste
3. Research methodology
4. Conclusions
References
참고문헌 (19)
참고문헌 신청
M. N. Mulenga, Towards sustainable construction waste minimization and management in Zambia and beyond. Rwanda, J. Eng. Sci. Technol. Environ., 1(1), 1-10(2018).
C. Luangcharoenrat, S. Intrachooto, V. Peansupap, W. Sutthinarakorn, Factors influencing construction waste generation in building construction: Thailand’s perspective, Sustainability, 11(13), 1-17(2019).
C. T. Formoso, E. H. Hirota, Method for waste control in the building industry, in Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Engineering, Berkeley, USA, pp. 325-234(1999).
I. Saidu, W. Shakantu, The contributions of construction material waste to project cost overruns in Abuja, Nigeria, Acta Structilia, 23(1), 99-113(2016).
A. Turkyilmaz, M. Guney, F. Karaca, Z. Bagdatkyzy, A comprehensive construction and demolition waste management model using PESTEL and 3R for construction companies operating in central Asia, Sustainability, 11(6), 1593(2019).
C. Luangcharoenrat, S. Intrachooto, V. Peansupap, W. Sutthinarakorn, Factors influencing construction waste generation in building construction: Thailand’s perspective, Sustainability, 11(13), 1-17(2019).
C. T. Formoso, E. H. Hirota, Method for waste control in the building industry, in Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Engineering, Berkeley, USA, pp. 325-234(1999).
I. Saidu, W. Shakantu, The contributions of construction material waste to project cost overruns in Abuja, Nigeria, Acta Structilia, 23(1), 99-113(2016).
A. Turkyilmaz, M. Guney, F. Karaca, Z. Bagdatkyzy, A comprehensive construction and demolition waste management model using PESTEL and 3R for construction companies operating in central Asia, Sustainability, 11(6), 1593(2019).
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
CONSTRUCTION 4.0
대한토목학회지
2024 .01
-
Identifying Wastes in Construction Process and Implementing the Last Planner System in India
Journal of construction engineering and project management
2016 .01
-
[건설법률이 궁금해] 공사현장 관리 어떻게?
대한토목학회지
2025 .03
-
[건설법률이 궁금해] 시공감리도 건설사업관리인가요? : 전주지방법원 2024. 1. 11. 선고 2023구합11525 벌점부과취소 판결손해배상(기) 판결
대한토목학회지
2024 .12
-
텍사스 A&M 주립대학교 건설과학과 소개
건축
2016 .03
-
제주지역 소규모 건설사업관리 사례 분석
공학기술논문지
2017 .09
-
대학생의 건설산업 이미지 수준 분석 및 향상방안
대한건축학회논문집
2022 .05
-
건설공사 공종별 특성을 반영한 비작업기간 산정모델
대한건축학회 논문집 - 구조계
2016 .02
-
Perception Based Definition of Construction Quality in Pakistan
Journal of construction engineering and project management
2015 .01
-
건설 공정 지연 예측을 위한 인공지능 기반 경고 시스템 개발
대한산업공학회지
2022 .08
-
Urban facility construction planning system using location-time information
한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
2019 .01
-
[용어와 건축] 스마트 건설: 건설자동화와 건설로봇화로부터, 유래와 정의
건축
2021 .02
-
공동주택 조경공사의 적정공사기간 산정에 관한 연구
대한건축학회논문집
2021 .02
-
Analysis of the Interrelationship and Stagnant Strategy according to the Transition Process and Sales Analysis of the Domestic Construction, Design, and CM Industries
KIEAE Journal
2020 .08
-
4차 산업 시대에서의 국내 건설 산업 전망
KIEAE Journal
2020 .08
-
DEVELOPMENT OF PH-REDUCING TYPE CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGY BY APPLYING THE LIQUID ACCELERATED CARBONATION USING CONSTRUCTION WASTES AND INDUSTRIAL BY-PRODUCTS
AFORE
2015 .11
-
오프 사이트 건축 (Off-Site Construction)의 과거, 현재, 미래 - 영국과 한국의 사례를 중심으로 -
대한건축학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2020 .10
-
대공간 지붕 철골공사의 시공계획 중점관리항목 도출
한국공간구조학회지
2018 .01
-
An integral based fuzzy approach to evaluate waste materials for concrete
Smart structures and systems
2017 .01
-
건설업 위험성평가 기반 이동형 CCTV 관제시스템 설계에 관한 연구
한국위험물학회지
2022 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-539-001850448