메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김정인 (Soongsil University)
저널정보
대한국토·도시계획학회 국토계획 國土計劃 第56卷 第2號(通卷 第255號)
발행연도
2021.4
수록면
189 - 207 (19page)
DOI
10.17208/jkpa.2021.04.56.2.189

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In the 21st century, the Eco-City concept has become the dominant paradigm for urban development in the Yellow Sea region. Focusing on Northeast China, this study tries to illuminate the Eco-City model planned in the eastern coast of China, in areas such as the Dongtan Eco-City and the Nanhui New City near Shanghai, the Sino-German Eco-Park Near Qingdao, and the Sino-Singapore Tianjin Eco-City and Binhai New Area CBD near Tianjin. This study analyzes these Chinese Eco-Cities by comparing their ecological elements with two European coastal Eco-Cities, IJburg near Amsterdam in the Netherlands and Malmö in Sweden, which reveals the particular construction of “Ecology” in the current Eco-City construction. By comparing these five Chinese Eco-Cities and two European Eco-Cities, the study highlights the conspicuous differences between the European and Chinese cities. Using a comparative analysis, this study not only examines the emergence of future ecological developments manifesting in recent environmental standards, but also the change in the developmental paradigm in the making of contemporary Eco-Cities. On the Chinese east coast, the Eco-City paradigm includes the existing top-down approach to establish a world-class urban environment, create a shared technical element, and boost urbanization through ecological imageries. In contrast, the two European Eco-Cities in the North Sea present a method to create a participatory planning process. Their effort to create the bottom-up process shows the collective intelligence and the democratic decision making involved during the development. The new Eco-City paradigm emerging from the comparison between the two regions will benefit the production of new urban spaces that are more diverse and incremental, thus respecting our ecological nature and future generations.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 지역적 비교와 사회 공동체적 생태 항목
Ⅲ. 중국과 유럽 해안의 생태 도시계획
Ⅳ. 사회 생태적 계획요소 비교
Ⅴ. 결론
인용문헌References

참고문헌 (52)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-539-001684780