지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2019.12
- 수록면
- 1 - 137 (137page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Suwon city and nearby four municipalities including Hwaseong, Ansan, Uiwang and Siheung have a population of 3.45 million people, and the necessity of solving environmental problems through joint cooperation is increasing due to the increase in development and environmental demand. Currently, five cities have large and small inter-regional environmental conflicts, and the need for inter-regional environmental administration is emerging to solve these problems. In particular, air pollution, PM10 management conflicts, odor problems, management conflicts between upstream and downstream regions, cooperative problems due to deterioration of the ecological belt, and living environment complaints in neighboring areas due to various developments need to be resolved through cooperation among local governments.
Most residents of the Suwon city and nearby four municipalities agree on the need for inter-regional environmental administration to improve their quality of life and enhance their urban competitiveness. This study suggests findings and cooperation of inter-regional environmental problems centering on air, water, waste, and natural ecology.
In the case of the atmospheric sector, the cases and issues of inter-regional environmental administration related to environmental damage due to the development of industrial complexes and housing sites, selection of the location of the environmental infrastructure, and management of the air emission plant were highlighted. As a cooperative alternative, the PM10 NGO network and the road pollution source solution was proposed. In the area of water and water ecology, the issues related to water source protection zone conflict, river water quality management upstream and downstream conflict such as Hwanggu stream, lake management conflict such as Wangsong Lake, and location of public sewage treatment facility appeared. As a result, it proposed concrete measures for mutual improvement of the lake and streams, and suggested joint management plans for watershed units. In the case of waste, issues of conflict over the location of environmental infrastructure such as food resource recycling facilities and resource recycling complexes and waste treatment methods were analyzed as inter-regional environmental problems. To this end, we proposed a joint cooperation plan for the operation of consultation structure, conservation of environmental damage and economic support. In the case of the management of natural ecosystem, we analyzed the cooperative measures related to prevention of damage to Gwanggyosan and Chilbosan. Major cooperation measures were proposed, including the formation of a consultative body, coordination of guidelines on ecological belt, joint biodiversity survey, expansion of protected areas at the Gyeonggi-do level, and the preparation of urban biotop maps.
It is important to play a role of coordinator as a superior organization through financial support, such as contribution of regional environmental administration activation fund, and various laws and institutions of central and Gyeonggi-do as a role plan of Gyeonggi-do, a higher local government.
The strategies to develop inter-regional environmental administration in the Suwon city and nearby four municipalities are as follows: 1) promoting joint investigation and data sharing, 2) revitalizing inter-regional environmental administration council with five cities, 3) organizing and co-operating with private sectors including NGOs, 4) enacting win-win development ordinances with five cities, 5) establishing a joint fund to revitalize inter-regional environmental administration, 6) activating the inter-regional administration method such as ‘entrustment’ to expand of joint installation and use of environmental infrastructure, 7) systematic promotion of discovery and selection of target projects for five cities, 8) promoting information sharing and performance PR through joint seminar, and 9) promoting Gyeonggi-do"s leading role in inter-regional environmental administration among five cities. 10) suggesting assistance to the central government and seeking ways to utilize the central government funds
Most residents of the Suwon city and nearby four municipalities agree on the need for inter-regional environmental administration to improve their quality of life and enhance their urban competitiveness. This study suggests findings and cooperation of inter-regional environmental problems centering on air, water, waste, and natural ecology.
In the case of the atmospheric sector, the cases and issues of inter-regional environmental administration related to environmental damage due to the development of industrial complexes and housing sites, selection of the location of the environmental infrastructure, and management of the air emission plant were highlighted. As a cooperative alternative, the PM10 NGO network and the road pollution source solution was proposed. In the area of water and water ecology, the issues related to water source protection zone conflict, river water quality management upstream and downstream conflict such as Hwanggu stream, lake management conflict such as Wangsong Lake, and location of public sewage treatment facility appeared. As a result, it proposed concrete measures for mutual improvement of the lake and streams, and suggested joint management plans for watershed units. In the case of waste, issues of conflict over the location of environmental infrastructure such as food resource recycling facilities and resource recycling complexes and waste treatment methods were analyzed as inter-regional environmental problems. To this end, we proposed a joint cooperation plan for the operation of consultation structure, conservation of environmental damage and economic support. In the case of the management of natural ecosystem, we analyzed the cooperative measures related to prevention of damage to Gwanggyosan and Chilbosan. Major cooperation measures were proposed, including the formation of a consultative body, coordination of guidelines on ecological belt, joint biodiversity survey, expansion of protected areas at the Gyeonggi-do level, and the preparation of urban biotop maps.
It is important to play a role of coordinator as a superior organization through financial support, such as contribution of regional environmental administration activation fund, and various laws and institutions of central and Gyeonggi-do as a role plan of Gyeonggi-do, a higher local government.
The strategies to develop inter-regional environmental administration in the Suwon city and nearby four municipalities are as follows: 1) promoting joint investigation and data sharing, 2) revitalizing inter-regional environmental administration council with five cities, 3) organizing and co-operating with private sectors including NGOs, 4) enacting win-win development ordinances with five cities, 5) establishing a joint fund to revitalize inter-regional environmental administration, 6) activating the inter-regional administration method such as ‘entrustment’ to expand of joint installation and use of environmental infrastructure, 7) systematic promotion of discovery and selection of target projects for five cities, 8) promoting information sharing and performance PR through joint seminar, and 9) promoting Gyeonggi-do"s leading role in inter-regional environmental administration among five cities. 10) suggesting assistance to the central government and seeking ways to utilize the central government funds
목차
[표지]
[정책건의]
[목차]
표차례
그림차례
[제1장 서론]
1. 연구의 배경 및 목적
2. 연구의 범위 및 방법
[제2장 수원시와 인접 지자체간 광역환경행정의 필요성]
1. 광역행정의 의의와 사례
2. 5개 시 행정 · 지리적 특성
3. 5개 시 광역환경행정의 필요성 분석
[제3장 수원시와 인접 지자체간 광역환경정책 발전방안]
1. 대기오염관리분야
2. 수질 · 수생태보전관리분야
3. 폐기물관리분야
4. 자연생태축관리분야
[제4장 결론 및 정책제언]
1. 결론
2. 정책제언
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
경기환경공단 설립을 위한 사전 연구
정책연구
2018 .07
-
광역관광개발에서 지역간 협력 요인이 사업집행 성과에 미치는 영향
관광레저연구
2015 .09
-
A New Measure of Inter-industry Distance and Its Application to the U.S. Regional Growth
[KIIP] 한국지식재산연구원 도서DB
2016 .12
-
The Effect of Environmental Capabilities on Environmental Strategy and Environmental Performance of Korean Exporters for Green Supply Chain Management
The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics
2017 .01
-
Environmental technology of trade competitiveness: The case of South Korea
국제지역연구
2015 .01
-
경기도의 기업 환경경영 지원 정책방안 연구
정책연구
2015 .12
-
경제주의 관점에서 본 일본의 환경정책
정치정보연구
2020 .02
-
The effect of environmental innovation behavior on economic and environmental performance of 182 Chinese firms
한국무역학회 국제학술대회
2017 .11
-
China’s North Korea Policy in Xi Jinping’s 1st Administration
국제학논총
2017 .12
-
내ㆍ외부환경경영요인, 환경성과 및 경영성과간의 관계
국제회계연구
2015 .02
-
기업의 산연협력 및 혁신성과에 영향을 미치는 요인 분석
무역연구
2020 .01
-
Protecting the Public from Environmental Hazards: Introducing the National Institute of Environmental Research
Recent Trends of Law & Regulation in Korea
2024 .06
-
환경안보를 위한 군 환경교육 강화 방안
Crisisonomy
2016 .01
-
국제개발협력 사업에서의 환경복지개념 적용가능성 검토
환경사회학연구 ECO
2016 .06
-
초미세먼지(PM2.5) 장기노출이 고령자의 환경성질환 사망률에 미치는 영향
환경정책
2023 .09
-
University Cooperation in Structural Violence, Public Administration, Climatic Changes, and Environmental Education
Journal of Global and Area Studies
2021 .01
-
Environmental Education Center Systems in Taiwan and Korea : National - Regional - Local centers and their roles
한국환경교육학회 학술대회 자료집
2016 .06
-
中國環境問題和地方政府的戰行爲: 以中央與地方關系的角度來分析
대한정치학회보
2018 .01
-
지방자치단체 남북교류협력사업 평가지표 개발 및 평가
정책연구
2020 .08
-
Priorities of Air Quality and Waste Issues to Solve Living Environment Problems: Focused on the AHP Analysis for Chungbuk Citizens in Korea
Journal of Safety and Crisis Management
2021 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-309-000073114