Comparison Different Methods of Intraoperative and Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Patients with Gastric Cancer: A Meta-analysis

Huang, Jin-Yu; Xu, Ying-Ying; Sun, Zhe; Zhu, Zhi; Song, Yong-Xi; Guo, Peng-Tao; You, Yi; Xu, Hui-Mian

추천

검색

자료유형: 학술저널

저자정보: Huang, Jin-Yu (Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, First Hospital of China Medical University) Xu, Ying-Ying (Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, First Hospital of China Medical University) Sun, Zhe (Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, First Hospital of China Medical University) Zhu, Zhi (Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, First Hospital of China Medical University) Song, Yong-Xi (Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, First Hospital of China Medical University) Guo, Peng-Tao (Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, First Hospital of China Medical University) You, Yi (Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, First Hospital of China Medical University) Xu, Hui-Mian (Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, First Hospital of China Medical University)

저널정보: 아시아태평양암예방학회 Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP 제13권 제9호

발행연도: 2012.1

수록면: 4,379 - 4,385 (7page)

이용수

📌

연구주제

📖

연구배경

🔬

연구방법

🏆

연구결과

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기

Purpose: To investigate the efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) for patients with gastric cancer and to compare effects between different regimens of IPC. Method: Randomized controlled trials comparing the effects of surgery plus intraperitoneal chemotherapy with surgery alone or comparing the efficacy between different regimens of intraperitoneal chemotherapy were searched for in Medline, Embase, Pubmed, the Cochrane Library and the Chinese BioMedical Disc and so on by two independent reviewers. After quality assessment and data extraction, data were pooled for meta-analysis using RevMan5.16 software. Tests of interaction were used to test for differences of effects among subgroups grouped according to different IPC regimens. Results: Fifteen RCTs with a total of 1713 patients with gastric cancer were included for quality assessment and data extraction. Ten studies were judged to be of fair quality and entered into meta-analysis. Hyperthermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HR=0.60, P<0.01), hyperthermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy plus postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HR=0.47, P<0.01) and normothermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HR=0.70, P=0.01) were associated with a significant improvement in overall survival. Tests of interaction showed that hyperthermia and additional postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy did not impact on its effect. Further analysis revealed that intraperitoneal chemotherapy remarkably decrease the rate of postoperative hepatic metastasis by 73% (OR=0.27, 95% CI=0.12 to 0.67, P<0.01). However, intraperitoneal chemotherapy increased risks of marrow depression (OR=5.74, P<0.01), fever (OR=3.67, P=0.02) and intra-abdominal abscess (OR=3.57, P<0.01). Conclusion: The present meta-analysis demonstrates that hyperthermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy and normothermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy should be recommended to treat patients with gastric cancer because of improvement in overall survival. However, it is noteworthy that intraperitoneal chemotherapy can increase the risks of marrow depression, intra-abdominal abscesses, and fever.

#Gastric cancer #intraperitoneal chemotherapy #meta-analysis #hepatic metastasis #overall survival #safety

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

참고문헌이 DBpia에서 서비스 중이라면, [참고문헌 신청]을 통해 등록해보세요