Association of Rs11615 (C>T) in the Excision Repair Cross-complementing Group 1 Gene with Ovarian but not Gynecological Cancer Susceptibility: a Meta-analysis

Ma, Yong-Jun; Feng, Sheng-Chun; Hu, Shao-Long; Zhuang, Shun-Hong; Fu, Guan-Hua

추천

검색

자료유형: 학술저널

저자정보: Ma, Yong-Jun (Clinical Laboratory, Jinhua Central Hospital, Jinhua Hospital of Zhejiang University) Feng, Sheng-Chun (Clinical Laboratory, Jinhua Central Hospital, Jinhua Hospital of Zhejiang University) Hu, Shao-Long (Clinical Laboratory, Jinhua Central Hospital, Jinhua Hospital of Zhejiang University) Zhuang, Shun-Hong (Clinical Laboratory, Jinhua Central Hospital, Jinhua Hospital of Zhejiang University) Fu, Guan-Hua (Clinical Laboratory, Jinhua Central Hospital, Jinhua Hospital of Zhejiang University)

저널정보: 아시아태평양암예방학회 Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP 제15권 제15호

발행연도: 2014.1

수록면: 6,071 - 6,074 (4page)

이용수

📌

연구주제

📖

연구배경

🔬

연구방법

🏆

연구결과

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기

Background: Evidence suggests that the rs11615 (C>T) polymorphism in the ERCC1 gene may be a risk factor for gynecological tumors. However, results have not been consistent. Therefore we performed this meta-analysis. Methods: Eligible studies were identified by search of PubMed, MEDLINE and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were applied to assess associations between rs11615 (C>T) and gynecological tumor risk. Heterogeneity among studies was tested and sensitivity analysis was applied. Results: A total of 6 studies were identified, with 1,766 cases and 2,073 controls. No significant association was found overall between rs11615 (C>T) polymorphism and gynecological tumors susceptibility in any genetic model. In further analysis stratified by cancer type, significantly elevated ovarian cancer risk was observed in the homozygote and recessive model comparison (TT vs. CC: OR=1.69, 95% CI=1.03-2.77, heterogeneity=0.876; TT vs. CT/CC: OR=1.72, 95% CI=1.07-2.77, heterogeneity=0.995). Conclusion: The results of the present meta-analysis suggest that there is no significant association between the rs11615 (C>T) polymorphism and gynecological tumor risk, but it had a increased risk in ovarian cancer.

#ERCC1 #polymorphism #gynecological tumor #ovarian cancer #meta-analysis

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

참고문헌이 DBpia에서 서비스 중이라면, [참고문헌 신청]을 통해 등록해보세요