US-guided 14G Core Needle Biopsy: Comparison Between Underestimated and Correctly Diagnosed Breast Cancers

Kim, Hana; Youk, Ji Hyun; Kim, Jeong-Ah; Gweon, Hye Mi; Jung, Woo-Hee; Son, Eun Ju

추천

검색

자료유형: 학술저널

저자정보: Kim, Hana (Department of Radiology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) Youk, Ji Hyun (Department of Radiology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) Kim, Jeong-Ah (Department of Radiology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) Gweon, Hye Mi (Department of Radiology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) Jung, Woo-Hee (Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) Son, Eun Ju (Department of Radiology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine)

저널정보: 아시아태평양암예방학회 Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP 제15권 제7호

발행연도: 2014.1

수록면: 3,179 - 3,183 (5page)

이용수

📌

연구주제

📖

연구배경

🔬

연구방법

🏆

연구결과

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기

Background: The purpose of study was to evaluate radiologic or clinical features of breast cancer undergoing ultrasound (US)-guided 14G core needle biopsy (CNB) and analyze the differences between underestimated and accurately diagnosed groups. Materials and Methods: Of 1,898 cases of US-guided 14G CNB in our institute, 233 cases were proven to be cancer by surgical pathology. The pathologic results from CNB were invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) (n=157), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (n=40), high-risk lesions in 22 cases, and benign in 14 cases. Among high-risk lesions, 7 cases of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) were reported as cancer and 11 cases of DCIS were proven IDC in surgical pathology. Some 29 DCIS cases and 157 cases of IDC were correctly diagnosed with CNB. The clinical and imaging features between underestimated and accurately diagnosed breast cancers were compared. Results: Of 233 cancer cases, underestimation occurred in 18 lesions (7.7%). Among underestimated cancers, CNB proven ADH (n=2) and DCIS (n=11) were diagnosed as IDC and CNB proven ADH (n=5) were diagnosed at DCIS finally. Among the 186 accurately diagnosed group, the CNB results were IDC (n=157) and DCIS (n=29). Comparison of underestimated and accurately diagnosed groups for BI-RADS category, margin of mass on mammography and US and orientation of lesion on US revealed statistically significant differences. Conclusions: Underestimation of US-guided 14G CNB occurred in 7.7% of breast cancers. Between underestimated and correctly diagnosed groups, BI-RADS category, margin of the mass on mammography and margin and orientation of the lesions on US were different.

#Breast neoplasm #core needle biopsy #breast ultrasonography #diagnostic error

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

참고문헌이 DBpia에서 서비스 중이라면, [참고문헌 신청]을 통해 등록해보세요