Park, Yong-Seog
(Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Cheil General Hospital and Women's Healthcare Center, Kwandong University College of Medicine)
Park, Sol
(Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Cheil General Hospital and Women's Healthcare Center, Kwandong University College of Medicine)
Ko, Duck Sung
(Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Cheil General Hospital and Women's Healthcare Center, Kwandong University College of Medicine)
Park, Dong Wook
(Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Cheil General Hospital and Women's Healthcare Center, Kwandong University College of Medicine)
Seo, Ju Tae
(Department of Urology, Cheil General Hospital and Women's Healthcare Center, Kwandong University College of Medicine)
Yang, Kwang Moon
(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cheil General Hospital and Women's Healthcare Center, Kwandong University College of Medicine)
Objective: The presence of sperm-head vacuoles has been suspected to be deleterious to the outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART). It is difficult to accurately distinguish morphologically abnormal sperm with vacuoles under a light microscope. This study was performed to analyze the result of the observation of sperm-head vacuoles using Papanicolaou staining under a light microscope and whether the male partner's age affects these vacuoles. Methods: Sperm morphology with vacuoles was evaluated using Papanicolaou staining and observed under a light microscope ($400{\times)$) in 980 men. The normal morphology was divided into three categories (group A, <4% of normal morphology; group B, 4%-14% of normal morphology; and group C, >14% of normal morphology). The criteria for the sperm-head vacuoles were those given in the World Health Organization manual. For the analysis of the age factor, the participants were divided into the following groups: 26-30 years, 31-35 years, 36-40 years, 41-45 years, and 46-50 years. Results: The percentage of sperm-head vacuoles increased with normal sperm morphology (group A vs. groups B, C) (p<0.05). In the case of the age factor, a statistically significant difference was not observed across any of the age groups. Conclusion: A majority of the sperm-head vacuoles showed a statistically significant difference among normal morphology groups. Therefore, we should consider the probability of the percentage of sperm-head vacuoles not increasing with age but with abnormal sperm morphology. A further study is required to clarify the effect of the sperm-head vacuoles on ART outcomes.