메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
연구보고서
저자정보
James Kim
저널정보
국립중앙도서관 국립중앙도서관 연계자료 국립중앙도서관 연계자료, 2018년 제14호
발행연도
2018.1
수록면
0 - 0 (139page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In this study, the OSP means a person who provides matching or mediate commercial trades and who helps other to get commercial success by posting goods or information of goods to help a person to buy trough internet. The matching service or mediating service of posting information of commercial goods usually provided by a big OSP company. Contributory infringement of intellectual propertys(IPRs) is usually understood as an act where some one assists to another in infringing IPRs, for example, intentionally providing an internet selling site for counterfeiters of trademarks or intentionally providing materials or components to counterfeiters for manufacturing counterfeit goods. Currently, OSP includes the Coupang and Amazon, a selling company through the internet, and Auction, 11th, Gmarket, interpark, as well as naver, daum, danawa, bb, enuri who provide information about the price of goods. It also includes the internet Cafe in Naver and Daum. Mostly, the matters regarding infringing trademark occurs through small group of Social Network Service. OSP’s contributory infringement of the trademarks are responsible as inducement, aid and abet. the US, EU, China, and Japan impose responsibility of contributory liability to OSP. The U.S. does not have any express provision of contributory liability in trademark called as Lanham Act but recognizes the secondary liability to OSP who contribute the direct infringer to infringe trademark right under the common law. At common law, contributory liability is established when: (1) the defendant knows of the infringement; and (2) the defendant materially contributes to or induces the infringement. The Inwood, the Supreme Court states: “[I]f a manufacturer or distributer [sic] intentionally induces another to infringe a trademark, or if it continues to supply its product to one whom it knows or has reason to know is engaging in trademark infringement, the manufacturer or distributor is contributorially responsible for any harm done as a result of the deceit.” Inwood test requires inducement, or “a knowledge standard of knowing or having reason to know.” It also requires that the OSP continuously and knowingly provide service for the direct infringer. After Inwood, Lockheed Martin Corporation v. Network Solutions, Inc., (“NSI”) the court states that it is requried to recognize the contributory liability “[d]irect control and monitoring of the instrumentality used by a third party to infringe the plaintiff’s mark” to be liable for contributory infringement. Then the 9th Circuit also states that "contributory infringement occurs when the defendant either intentionally induces a third party to infringe the plaintiff s mark or supplies a product to a third party with actual or constructive knowledge that the product is being used to infringe the service mark." The court ruled that if they supply a product knowingly a third-party is reselling under a label containing a fake trademark that the third party has no right to use, or when they rent space in a flea market to a third party with knowledge selling infringing goods, the parties are guilty of contributory infringement. The 9th Court established the Lockheed Martine rule that requires “direct control and monitoring test” to be guilt of contributory infringement. In Fare Deals, Ltd. v. World Choice Travel.com, Inc., the court found that “[e]ven if the facts suggested … that [the defendant] might be contributorily liable because it ‘supplied a product’ to the infringers or directly controlled and monitored the means of infringement, [the defendant could not] demonstrate the requisite knowledge of the infringing activity to find it liable under Inwood Laboratories.” In Fare Deals, the court expressly required that the plaintiff “directly controlled and monitored the activities of the [plaintiff’s] site and that [the defendant] had actual knowledge of the infringement.” In EU, OSP is responsible to the contributory infringement of the trademark for selling counterfeit products on the OSP’s website. The court ruled that LVMH was entitled to damages from Ebay’s contributory infrigement. Article 14 of the European Community Directive on electronic commerce provides that a hoster is granted liability protection if (1) it does not have actual knowledge of infringing activity or is not aware of circumstances where illegal activity could be apparent or (2) if it does have actual knowledge, it acts “expeditiously” to remove or prevent access to the illegal activity. Article 6-1-2 of the French Law for Confidence in the Digital Economy was created based on Article 14 of the European Community Directive on electronic commerce. China very actively enacted law regarding the contributory liability of OSP. It seems that the Chinese government’s intend to establish a business industry based on internet. Recent prosperity of internet based trade business in China could be contributed to the Chinese governments policy establishing contributory liability of OSP who induces or assists the direct infringement of trademark. In my proposal of establishing contributory liability clause in Korean Trademark Act regarding contributory liability of OSP who induce or assist direct infringement. Followings are must be included for the act which provide contributory infringement of trademark. For the recognition of contributory infringement selling counterfeit goods must be “controlled and monitored” by OSP. Another prong for recognition of contributory infringement OSP "intentionally induces another to infringe a trademark“. If an OSP continues to supply its service to one whom OSP knows or has reason to know is engaging in trademark infringement.” Details of proposed provisions of OSP’s liability for inducing and assisting direct infringement of trademark are in the body section of this report
#위조품[僞造品] #상표법(법률)[商標法]

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청
참고문헌이 DBpia에서 서비스 중이라면, [참고문헌 신청]을 통해 등록해보세요

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0