메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이미선 (한국지방재정공제회) 김효준 (한국지방재정공제회)
저널정보
한국색채학회 한국색채학회논문집 한국색채학회논문집 제34권 제3호(통권 제87호)
발행연도
2020.8
수록면
5 - 13 (9page)
DOI
10.17289/jkscs.34.3.202008.5

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study aimed to present data in order for laws and systems on outdoor advertisements to have more reasonable and specific color expressions. To this end, it researched and analyzed tendencies of perception by the audience, focused on ‘shades of black’ shown from the Outdoor Advertisement Ordinance, and conclusions derived from the research are as follows. First, there was a tendency that shades of black were perceived according to a tone regardless of a hue. Colors in BK(Black), bk(Blackish), dkGy(dark gray), dkgy(dark grayish) tone domains were mainly perceived as the shades of black. In particular, colors in BK(Black) and bk(Blackish) tone domains were strongly perceived as the shades of black. Second, shades of black could be classified into 3 factors according to their tone characteristics, and there was a trend that a degree of confidence as the shades of black increasingly strengthened in order of factor2(dkGy, dkgy), factor1(bk) and factor3(BK). Hence, even in the shades of black, it shows that a degree of perceiving colors as the shades of black varies as their tone characteristics. Third, there was no difference in the perception of shades of black according to gender and age but the study found out differences in tones under a category of shades of black depending on engagement and non-engagement in outdoor advertising except for BK(black) tone perceived as the shades of black with the strongest confidence. It reveals that for the same color employees were relatively more strict in consent to shades of black than non-employees.

목차

Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Background
3. Research Methods
4. Analysis Results
5. Conclusion
References

참고문헌 (15)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-651-001161070