메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
문민주 (고려병원 방사선과)
저널정보
대한영상의학회 대한방사선의학회지 대한방사선의학회지 제25권 제2호
발행연도
1989.1
수록면
273 - 280 (8page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
For the evaluation of acute appendicitis many diagnostic methods such as physical ex-amination laboratory findings plain abdomen and barium enema have been widely used. But the overall accuracy was ranged from 50% to 84% and negative appendectomy rate was reported between 5% and 35% In these days resolusion ultrasonography is well known to be a good imaging modality in evaluation of acute appendicitis and its complications. Using high resolution ultrasonography 138 patients with right lower quadrant abdominal pain were examined for 16 months. The results were compared to post-operative findings and clinical follows: 1. the sex distribution of cases were 58 males and 80 females and most common in the third decade(33.3%) 2. The positice ultrasonographic findings were in 69 cases(50%) those were simple appendi-citis without complication in 46 cases (66.7%) acute appendicitis with periappendicitis in 9 cases (13.0%) acute appendicitis with abscess in 6 cases (8.7%) acute appendicits with appendicolith in 4 cases (5.8%) and perforated appendicitis in 4 cases (16%) 3. The ultrasonographic findgs of normal appendix were in 69 cases(50%) those were nonvisualization of appendix in 62 cases (91.3%) and visualization of normal appendix with single thin echogenic wall in 6 cases(8.7%) 4. In the 50 cases of control group the visualization of normal appendix on ultrasonography were in 8 cases (16%). 5. The ovarall accuracy was 95.7% with 97.1%of sensitivity and 94.4% of specificity.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0