메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김도균 (한림대학교 진단방사선과학교실)
저널정보
대한영상의학회 대한방사선의학회지 대한방사선의학회지 제37권 제3호
발행연도
1997.1
수록면
561 - 565 (5page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose : The purpose of our study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of mammography and breast ultrasonography between fibroadenoma and palpable breast cancer and to evaluate the feasibility of ultrasonography as a primry diagnostic modality to differnetiate between these two tumor types. Materials and Methods : In 36 cases of fibroadenoma and 35 of breast cancer, all palpable and pathologically-proven, the diagnostic accuracy of mammography and ultrasonography was retrospectively analysed. Results : In firbroadenoma cases, the diagnostic accuracy of mammography and ultrasonography was 53% and 80%, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant(p = 0.0162). In cases of breast cancer, the corresponding figures were 74% and 82%, respectively ; the difference was not statistically signigicant(p = 0.55). Overall, the diagnostic accuracy of mammography and ultrasonography was 63% and 82%, respectively, and this difference was statistically significant(p = 0.0164). The total diagnostic accuracy of both studies was 90%, and this was signigicantly different(p = 0.044) from that of ultrasonography(82%). Conclusion : In patients who have clinically palpable breast masses, ultrasonography can be recommended as the primary diagnostic modality, though for other breast lesions, mammography is the recommended primary modality.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0