메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
고려대학교 중국학연구소 중국학논총 중국학논총 제67호
발행연도
2020.1
수록면
105 - 132 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper is a study of various views of Chinese novel reading attitude, appreciation and criticism by writers of the 18th century Joseon Dynasty. The resulting conclusions are as follows: First, the novel criticism of 18th century Joseon writers is mainly focused on the Sidaqishu(四大奇書), which seems to be related to the revitalization of the publishing and translation industries of the time, as well as a measure of which works were most popular at that time. Second, it is also limited to the Sidaqishu(四大奇書) in terms of content criticism. Third, if the novel’s value was recognized as the positive value of utility until the 17th century, there were few criticisms of the positive value of utility in the 18th century. This is a result of reflecting the social atmosphere of the time. The problem of this study began with the question of how to expand the horizons of classical Chinese literature research and comparative literature between Korea and China. It is a truly dangerous idea to think that the interpretation of the book is outdated or unrelated to today’s sense of real problems, given that it is a relic of the past. Studying the classics is an act of ceaselessly speaking to the wisdom of our ancient ancestors, which has been embedded in our bodies, and of casting a serious question about the fundamental value of human existence. In the face of the talk of the crisis of humanities today, one can expect that the Korean classics will enable understanding of the culture and substance of traditional society, as well as the history of knowledge exchange between Korea and China, and that they will be a good research example in the comparative research of Korea and China, thus making a significant contribution academically. Moreover, at the end of this project, the individual and comprehensive study of Chinese novels in the 18th century’s various literary writings will eventually be a step forward in the study of traditional Korean literature and the mixed study of Chinese classical novels, and the exchange of Korean and Chinese literature with each other will further embody each other’s research achievements. Furthermore, if the Chinese literature community is interested in the research, it will contribute to providing multi-disciplinary research tasks and boosting research exchanges through reading Chinese novels and enhancing the value of reviews outside of China. China and Korea have a cultural character that has both congregations and combinations against the backdrop of East Asian cultures. In my view, the task of examining sentences that read the same book 200 years ago and commented frankly on its impressions will not be merely to establish the relationship of influence, but also to find the independent aspects and meaning of our culture and to present the humanities achievements that live up to the cultural realities of the current turbulent Korea-China relations. This will also increase academic efficiency through links between classical and contemporary, closed but open academic exchanges.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청
참고문헌이 DBpia에서 서비스 중이라면, [참고문헌 신청]을 통해 등록해보세요

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0