메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국화법학회 화법연구 화법연구 제48호
발행연도
2020.1
수록면
1 - 35 (35page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study aims to verify the reliability of peer evaluation during persuasive and informative speaking in university liberal arts speech classes. To this end, it presented 46 university students with persuasive and informative speaking assignments and conducted a peer evaluation during their presentations. Subsequently, the students’ evaluation results were analyzed by applying the multi-faceted Rasch model. The analysis focused on evaluator appropriateness, evaluator bias, and the appropriateness of criteria and evaluation standards. The results of the analysis showed that 6 evaluators demonstrated inappropriate evaluation behavior during the persuasive speaking evaluation, and 13 were confirmed as over-fit and unfit evaluators in the informative speaking evaluation. Further, a greater over-fit reaction was found in the informative speaking evaluation for severity variability and evaluator agreement. Moreover, differences were found in using evaluation standards. The most severe evaluation was for the contents of persuasive speaking, and the most severe reaction was found in the delivery of informative speaking. In addition, a tendency for over-fit evaluation was found in the organization criteria for informative speaking. Thus, the results of the research highlighted different evaluation tendencies from the same evaluator based on the genre of speech. Therefore, there is a need for evaluator training based on genre.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0