지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2019.12
- 수록면
- 179 - 202 (24page)
- DOI
- 10.20879/acr.2019.16.3.179
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The main purpose of this essay is to encourage novice scholars to participate in the peer review process. This essay discusses how to communicate during the process as a reviewer and an author. When evaluating a manuscript as a reviewer, the scholar needs to show respect to the authors, be cooperative with other members of the review team, and be timely with completing the review. The reviewer needs to also communicate with the editors regarding any concerns or problems in evaluating the submitted manuscript. More importantly, a reviewer needs to be consistent in the tone and the content of the evaluation when communicating with either the editor or the author. As an author, knowing the expectations of the editors, adhering to the submission guidelines, not taking rejections personally, and being reasonably flexible in adhering to the reviewer’s comments are some of the communicative strategies a scholar needs to bear in mind during the review process. Consequently, the peer review process will benefit from having scholars who use these communicative strategies.
목차
Abstract
A Brief Account of the Review Process
Communicating as a Reviewer
Communicating as an Author
Conclusion
References
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Before you click “submit,” be your own first reviewer
Science Editing
2023 .02
-
Development of an open peer review system using blockchain and reviewer recommendation technologies
Science Editing
2021 .01
-
GUIDE for REVIEWERS of MANUSCRIPT 외
글로벌문화연구
2020 .03
-
Can training doctoral students to participate in peer review alleviate the shortage of peer reviewers in academic publishing?
Science Editing
2024 .02
-
극도의 부정적 평점 리뷰가 리뷰유용성에 미치는 영향 : 리뷰어 속성의 조절효과
서비스경영학회지
2021 .03
-
Volunteering as a reviewer
Science Editing
2020 .01
-
편집위원장 서언: 심사자가 된다는 것
인사조직연구
2017 .01
-
Recruiting Voluntary Reviewers and Turn-Taking in Editorial Leadership
Asian Communication Research
2019 .12
-
The moderating role of cultural background in the impact of review content and reviewer characteristics on review helpfulness
한국경영과학회 학술대회논문집
2023 .05
-
From the Editor
관광연구저널
2020 .04
-
From the Editor
관광연구저널
2016 .04
-
From the Editor
관광연구저널
2021 .04
-
From the Editor
관광연구저널
2022 .04
-
Can we improve the peer review system?
Science Editing
2017 .01
-
L2 Students' Perceptions and Practices of both Giving and Receiving Online Peer-Feedback
멀티미디어 언어교육
2018 .01
-
Reflections on the Basic Manuscript Editors’ Training 2017
Science Editing
2017 .01
-
Consultation questions on publication ethics from 2016 to 2020 addressed by the Committee on Publication Ethics of the Korean Council of Science Editors
Science Editing
2021 .01
-
Research ethics and issues regarding the use of ChatGPT-like artificial intelligence platforms by authors and reviewers: a narrative review
Science Editing
2024 .08
-
유치원 만 3세 학급 유아들의 긍정적 또래관계 지원을 위한 실행연구
교육과학연구
2016 .06
-
Experience of taking the first Korea Manuscript Editors Certification examination
Science Editing
2017 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-070-000244293