메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이종민 (동국대학교) 조형오 (동국대학교)
저널정보
한국색채학회 한국색채학회논문집 한국색채학회논문집 제33권 제4호(통권 제84호)
발행연도
2019.11
수록면
67 - 79 (13page)
DOI
10.17289/jkscs.33.4.201911.67

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study investigated how various types of value affect consumer attitude toward 10 basic colors as well as receptiveness to color typicality of a product. In this vein, Schwartz value system was adopted as a testing framework for the research. An on-line survey was conducted among 500 males and females in their age range of 20-29 and the participants were asked to indicate their values, color attitudes, and purchase intention toward a tissue brand with disparate color typicality. Key findings show that attitude toward red color was positively influenced by self-enhancement value and negatively affected by self-transcendence and conservation values. A similar pattern of the relationship was also observed for attitude toward black color. By contrast, attitudes toward green and brown colors were negatively affected by self-enhancement value and positively affected by self-transcendence value. Interestingly, gender difference was found in the attitude toward yellow color where it was positively affected by conservation value among females and negatively affected by self-enhancement value among males. Secondly, value was found to moderate the effect of color typicality of a product on purchase intention such that self-enhancement value dimension increased the positive impact of color typicality on purchase intention mainly via power, whereas the opposite was observed for openness-to-change value dimension mainly via hedonism and stimulation. Both theoretical and managerial implications of the study were further discussed.

목차

Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Research Problems
3. Research Methodology
4. Data Analysis
5. Discussion and Conclusion
References

참고문헌 (44)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-651-000127183