메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
21세기영어영문학회 영어영문학21 영어영문학21 제32권 제1호
발행연도
2019.1
수록면
201 - 230 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper explores how Charles Dickens’s Dombey and Son (1848) demonstrates the connection between the transformation of masculinity and the changes in the notions of vision and the observer in the early nineteenth century by focusing on its three male characters: Paul Dombey, James Carker, and Dombey’s son called little Paul. From his original status as a Cartesian subject, which is established in Dickens’s use of camera obscura images for him, Dombey degenerates into a being-as-object who is stupefied into passivity and lethargy after losing his controlling patriarchal power. I scrutinize how Dombey’s downfall is associated with the collapse of the camera obscura model of vision and subjectivity. I read Carker—e.g. his failed attempt to use his versatility and sharp eyes to subvert and steal Dombey’s social and economic power—through a changed meaning of the camera obscura in The German Ideology (1845-46) by Marx and Engels as a degenerative metaphor for procedures and forces that conceal, invert, and distort ideologies. Little Paul’s awareness of his subjectivity as being-as-object, which exists only in front of the other-as-subject, can be read as a precursor to the twentieth-century discourse on the reorganization of the visual relationship between subject and object and the decentralization of the subject-as-observer’s ruling position by Sartre. However, the early death of Paul Jr. implies that he fails to provide an alternative model of reciprocal male gazer/subject.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (31)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0