메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국임상약학회 한국임상약학회지 한국임상약학회지 제17권 제2호
발행연도
2007.1
수록면
87 - 95 (9page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background: The systematic retrieval processing is essential to search articles, especially, in pharmacoeconomics area. However, there has been limited information and knowledge about features and differences among medical search engines. Objectives: This study was aimed to compare four major retrieval engines (PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and EMBASE) frequently used for drug literature search to collect clinical data for pharmacoeconomic evaluation. Methods: Four major retrieval engines were compared in terms of search results. The pharmacoeconomic evaluation senario was made that pharmacoeconomic evaluation of two oral medicines for smoking cessation, bupropione and varenicline. Free text keyword search was conducted with bupropione, varenicline, and smoking cessation. Search limits included period, types of study designs (randomized controlled trials and systemic reviews), language. SAS 9.1 and Excel 2002 were used for statistical analysis. Results and Conclusions: EMBASE provided the largest number of articles in each search step among four engines. EMBASE also had many unique articles that were retrievable exclusively from its engine and Medline and EMBASE retrieved many common articles in most of search process. Articles from US were more than 50% in EMBASE and Medline. EMBASE has greater number of articles originated from Europe.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0