지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The aims of this study are to analyze difference between pragmatic productive competence and pragmatic understanding competence and to determine influencing factors on the difference. Pragmatic competence is very important along with grammatical competence to improve communicative competence. However there are not many studies on pragmatic competence in Korean education studies. Therefore, I studied pragmatic competence of Korean learners as comparison between pragmatic productive competence and pragmatic understanding competence. Specifically, I studied expressions for guessing and wish that are used for refusal, suggestion, request in context. In this study, I have two research questions: ⅰ) Is there difference between pragmatic productive competence and pragmatic understanding competence? ⅱ) If there is difference, what factors do influence the difference? In this study, influencing factors were determined as general proficiency and pragmatical functions. The instrument was used in this study is multiple choice test. And I used a t-test to analyze the data.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (20)
참고문헌 신청
Brown, P. / 1987 / Politeness: some universals in language usage / Cambridge University Press
Collins, L. / 2002 / The role of L1 influence and lexical aspect in the axquisition of tense and aspect / TESOL Quarterly 29 : 107 ~ 131
Karkkainen, E. / 1992 / Modality as a strategy in interaction: Epistemic modality in the language of native and non-native speakers of English, In Pragmatics and language learning(monog
Kasper, G. / 2001 / Four perspectives on L2 pragmatic development / Applied Linguistics 22 : 502 ~ 530
Takahashi, S. / 1996 / Pragmatic transferability / Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18 : 189 ~ 223
Collins, L. / 2002 / The role of L1 influence and lexical aspect in the axquisition of tense and aspect / TESOL Quarterly 29 : 107 ~ 131
Karkkainen, E. / 1992 / Modality as a strategy in interaction: Epistemic modality in the language of native and non-native speakers of English, In Pragmatics and language learning(monog
Kasper, G. / 2001 / Four perspectives on L2 pragmatic development / Applied Linguistics 22 : 502 ~ 530
Takahashi, S. / 1996 / Pragmatic transferability / Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18 : 189 ~ 223
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0