메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
국제한국어교육학회 한국어 교육 한국어 교육 제23권 제2호
발행연도
2012.1
수록면
281 - 300 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Temporal expression is one of important grammatical items in foreign language education. However, many learners of Korean language have difficulties when they learn Korean past tense. Specifically, Chinese language is a tenseless language while Korean is a tense-prominent language. In this study, we used Contrastive Analysis of Korean past tense marker ‘-ess-’ and Chinese perfective aspect marker ‘le’ in the perspective of linguistic typology. Based on this analysis, acquisition results of Chinese learners and of other foreign language-speaking learners were compared to determine whether the differences in them are due to universal development or cross-linguistic influence. 71 Chinese, 24 other foreigners, and native Korean 27 children and 42 adults participated in cloze tests, GJTs, and translation tasks. According to the results, Chinese learners consistently followed the Aspect Hypothesis, such that they were the slowest in learning past tense with State verbs(Adjectives). This could be explained by their transfer of Chinese perfect aspect in learning Korean past tense. Therefore, an efficient method of teaching Korean past tense includes the use of Garden Path and Input Enhancement techniques, and it is necessary to teach tense with adjectives and verbs separately

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (33)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0