메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국환경보건학회 한국환경보건학회지 한국환경보건학회지 제40권 제6호
발행연도
2014.1
수록면
454 - 468 (15page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Objectives: This study was conducted to investigate the actual condition of the farm work environment andpersonal protective equipment as part of the effort to improve livestock work for the safety and health of poultryfarmers and provide basic data for establishing plans to improve and develop personal protective equipment. Methods: For this purpose, a questionnaire survey on general information about stables, the poultry workenvironment, accidents, the wearing of work clothes and personal protective equipment, and the level ofawareness related to personal protective equipment was conducted among 148 poultry farmers. Results: As a result, it was found that poultry workplace environment was exposed to such risks as fine dusts;organic dusts; poisonous gases; odorous substances; chicken excrement; contact with chickens, bacteria orviruses; and accidents related to machine operation. Thirteen percent of respondents suffered severe respiratorydiseases, and the most frequently injured sites due to accidents were the hands (25.7%), knees (23.8%), arms(17.3%), and head (10.9%). The most frequent type of accident was collisions between the body and obstaclesor machinery during movement (36.4%), followed by erroneous machine operation such as feeders and electricshocks (8.5%). Regarding the wearing of work clothes and personal protective equipment, 51.7% of therespondents wore worn-out clothing or everyday clothes, whereas only 32.0% wore work clothes. Thepercentage of farmers who wore proper protective equipment for the work environment during poultry work was48.4%. The most frequently used type of protective equipment was boots (38.9%), followed by mask (36.7%),gloves (36.3%), appropriate work clothes (22.6%), quarantine clothes (17.6%), helmets (13.4%), and goggles(12.6%). The rate of wearing goggles was low because they were considered inconvenient and lowered workefficiency. Furthermore, they purchased everyday products available on the market for their personal protectiveequipment which were not appropriate for maintaining safety in an actual harmful environment and itsconsequent risks. As a result of the survey of the awareness level related to personal protective equipment, theirlevels of awareness of accidents and attitude proved to be average or higher, but the practice of wearingprotective equipment and the level of knowledge and management of personal protective equipment were lower. Conclusion: This survey found that the wearing status of personal protective equipment among poultry farmerswas insufficient even though they were exposed to risks. Most respondents were aware of the necessity ofwearing personal protective equipment and of the potential for accidents, but they did not wear proper protectiveequipment. Their wearing rate was low due to a lack of knowledge about protective equipment, as well as theinconvenience of wearing it. Therefore there is a need to improve and develop specialized personal protective equipment for respiration, hands, and eyes, as well as work clothes that can protect farmers from major harmfulmatter that is generated in the poultry workplace. Based on the results of this investigation, we will conductfurther studies on the required performance and design directions of personal protective equipment whilecollecting more objective data through field-oriented assessments.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (19)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0