메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국의학교육학회 Korean Journal of Medical Education Korean Journal of Medical Education 제21권 제2호
발행연도
2009.1
수록면
163 - 173 (11page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: The aims of this study were to explore the terms that patients preferred to be called during medical encounters and to provide a guideline about the proper use of appellations about patients in teaching medical students. Methods: Patients were asked to select items from given examples to indicate how they wanted to be addressed by their doctors and how their doctors tended to address them. These terms were categorized into 3 groups; 1) terms that includes name, 2) “patient+honorific suffix, boon (hwanja- boon)”, and 3) other general terms. The survey also included questions on patient’s perception of the importance of terms of address in building a good doctor-patient relationship. The questionnaire was distributed to 440 out-patients of the three university affiliated hospitals in Seoul and Gyeonggi province from August to September 2007. Results: Three hundred ninety-two respondents were analyzed after excluding 58 respondents who did not meet the study criteria. The ages of the respondents ranged from 18 to 80 years, and 56% of them were male. Most patients preferred to be called by the terms that includes their name (284, 72.4%) and the most preferred term was “family name (FN)+given name (GN)+honorific suffix, nim” (156, 39.8%), while doctors used the terms “patient+honorific suffix, boon” (188, 48.0%) most frequently. About 59% of respondents were addressed as they preferred. Patients in their 30s and 40s showed significantly higher perceptions of the importance of terms of address than other age groups (p= 0.0007). Conclusion: Patients preferred to be called by their full name with an honorific suffix; however, patients’ preferences and doctors’ usage were not in agreement in many cases. The results of this study suggest that doctors should pay more attention to the proper use of appellation during medical encounters. Furthermore, these results can be used to teach undergraduate medical students and guide physicians on how to address patients in practice.
#Communication #Physician-patient relations #Terms of address

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (20)

참고문헌 신청
Billings JA / 1999 / The clinical encounter: a guide to the medical interview and case presentation. 2nd ed / Mosby google schola Conant EB / 1983 / Addressing patients by their first names / N Engl J Med 308 : 226 ~ google schola Deber RB / 2005 / Patient, consumer, client, or customer: what do people want to be called? / Health Expect 8 : 345 ~ 351 google schola Furlow TW Jr / 1988 / Clinical etiquette: a critical primer / JAMA 260 : 2588 ~ 2589 google schola Gledhill JA / 1997 / Psychiatrists and their patients: views on forms of dress and address / Br J Psychiatry 171 : 228 ~ 232 google schola

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0