지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2016.1
- 수록면
- 69 - 75 (7page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Background/Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of high definition (HD) i-SCAN for colorectal polyp detection in screening colonoscopy.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the records of 501 patients who had undergone screening colonoscopy performed by three endoscopists with either HD i-SCAN (n=149) or standard white light (n=352) from January 2, 2014 through June 30, 2014. Patient information and inter-endoscopist variation as well as polyp number, endoscopic findings, and pathologic characteristics were reviewed.
Results: The detection rates of colorectal and neoplastic polyps were significantly higher using HD i-SCAN than standard white light colonoscopy (52% vs. 38.1%, p=0.004 for colorectal polyps; and 37.2% vs. 27.9%, p=0.041 for neoplastic polyps). Analysis of endoscopic findings revealed no difference in detected polyp size between HD i-SCAN and standard white light colonoscopy (4.59±2.35 mm vs. 4.82±2.81 mm, p=0.739), but non-protruding polyps were more commonly detected by i-SCAN than by standard white light colonoscopy (24.6% vs. 13.5%, p=0.007).
Conclusions: Colonoscopy using HD i-SCAN had a significantly higher detection rate of colorectal polyps, including neoplastic polyps, because of improved sensitivity for detecting non-protruding lesions.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (35)
참고문헌 신청
Hosokawa O / 2003 / Invasive colorectal cancer detected up to 3 years after a colonoscopy negative for cancer / Endoscopy 35:506~510
Farrar WD / 2006 / Colorectal cancers found after a complete colonoscopy / Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 4:1259~1264
Kaminski MF / 2010 / Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer / N Engl J Med 362:1795~1803
Rex DK / 1997 / Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies / Gastroenterology 112:24~28
Pickhardt PJ / 2004 / Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy / Ann Intern Med 141:352~359
Farrar WD / 2006 / Colorectal cancers found after a complete colonoscopy / Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 4:1259~1264
Kaminski MF / 2010 / Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer / N Engl J Med 362:1795~1803
Rex DK / 1997 / Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies / Gastroenterology 112:24~28
Pickhardt PJ / 2004 / Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy / Ann Intern Med 141:352~359
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Detection of Polyps After Resection of Colorectal Cancer
Annals of Coloproctology
2015 .01
-
Associations of Polyp Characteristics in Children and Adolescents Presenting with Less Than Five Colorectal Polyps: A Full Colonoscopy Is Still Required
Gut and Liver
2023 .05
-
Resection of Diminutive and Small Colorectal Polyps: What Is the Optimal Technique?
Clinical Endoscopy
2016 .01
-
Histologic discrepancy between endoscopic forceps biopsy and endoscopic mucosal resection specimens of colorectal polyp in actual clinical practice
Intestinal research
2018 .01
-
Miss rate of colorectal neoplastic polyps and risk factors for missed polyps in consecutive colonoscopies
Intestinal research
2017 .01
-
Optical Diagnosis for Colorectal Polyps: A Useful Technique Now or in the Future?
Gut and Liver
2018 .01
-
What are the Endoscopic and Pathological Characteristics of Colorectal Polyps?
Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP
2015 .01
-
The Association between Serum Vitamin D Concentration and Colon Polyp: A Cross-Sectional Study Using Health Care Screening Database in a Tertiary Hospital in Korea
Korean Journal of Family Medicine
2021 .01
-
The Colonoscopist's Expertise Affects the Characteristics of Detected Polyps
Clinical Endoscopy
2016 .01
-
Risk Factors for Recurrent High-Risk Polyps after the Removal of High-Risk Polyps at Initial Colonoscopy
Yonsei Medical Journal
2015 .01
-
Optical diagnosis by near-focus versus normal-focus narrow band imaging colonoscopy in colorectal polyps based on combined NICE and WASP classification: a randomized controlled trial
Clinical Endoscopy
2022 .09
-
Incidentally Discovered Solitary Gastrointestinal Polyp with Pathological Significance in Children: Four Case Reports
Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition
2018 .01
-
Long-Term Outcome and Surveillance Colonoscopy after Successful Endoscopic Treatment of Large Sessile Colorectal Polyps
Yonsei Medical Journal
2016 .01
-
Impact of User’s Background Knowledge and Polyp Characteristics in Colonoscopy with Computer-Aided Detection
Gut and Liver
2024 .09
-
Artificial Intelligence-Based Colorectal Polyp Histology Prediction by Using Narrow-Band Image-Magnifying Colonoscopy
Clinical Endoscopy
2022 .01
-
A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study Comparing the Diagnostic Accuracy of the Histologic Prediction for Colorectal Polyps Depending on the Use of Either Magnified or Nonmagnified Narrow Band Imaging
Clinical Endoscopy
2015 .01
-
Application of Artificial Intelligence in the Detection and Characterization of Colorectal Neoplasm
Gut and Liver
2021 .01
-
Endometrial polyps: Is the prediction of spontaneous regression possible?
Obstetrics & Gynecology Science
2021 .01
-
Factors influencing endoscopic estimation of colon polyp size in a colon model
Clinical Endoscopy
2022 .07
-
Risk factors including night shift work of colorectal polyp
대한직업환경의학회지
2020 .07
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0