메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국과학사학회 한국과학사학회지 한국과학사학회지 제34권 제3호
발행연도
2012.1
수록면
545 - 561 (17page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The publication of Thomas Kuhn’s The Structure of the Scientific Revolutions was a symptom of his age as much as a cause of the new era: immediate recognitions of the book as an important product of the era among the literary circle might be the evidence of this appraisal of the book. As a part of commemorative addresses on the publication of Kuhn’s Structure, this article excavates his personal sense of crisis on his own belief in rationality confronted with war experience, and explicates his colleagues’ sense of crises on their disciplinary traditions confronted with Kuhn’s Structure. Legacy of Kuhn’s Structure on his colleagues turns out to be somewhat ironic: many philosophers of science felt Kuhn’s language in the Structure as penetratingly serious challenge, yet they seem to be relatively unmoved in their traditional disciplinary orientation. Most historians of science found Kuhn rather traditional in mode of research, yet they completely refashioned the field of history of science, and for this change, Kuhn’s influence is undeniable. His younger colleague historians of science, particularly his former students, unanimously testified Kuhn as an influential teacher. But many of them seem to have difficulty with his somewhat stern apprenticeship for his students and seem to have misgivings on his rigidly narrow investigative research orientation centering around reading the mind of the past scientists. Yet in spite of their difficulties and misgivings, his fellow historians would not deny that they are now under Kuhn’s shadow in search of truth based on rationality.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (28)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0