메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국과학사학회 한국과학사학회지 한국과학사학회지 제36권 제3호
발행연도
2014.1
수록면
269 - 296 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
A large number of American civilian scientists were deployed to the Korean peninsula during the Korea War. Affiliated with the Operations Analysis Office (U.S. Air Force), Operations Research Office (U.S. Army), and Operations Evaluation Group (U.S. Navy), these scientists assisted the U.S. armed forces in carrying out military activities. The mission of the Operations Analysis Office (OAO) of the U.S. Air Force was to provide professional training applicable to air strikes by analyzing operational problems from a scientific perspective, as well as making scientists easily approachable to military commanders. A survey of the operations analysis reports reveals that they were concerned about the aircraft and bombs appropriate for the air strike missions and raising their accuracy rate. The OAO provided a broad range of ideas from detailed bombing tactics to analyses on armaments and equipment. For example, it provided advice on the interdiction operation, which was one of the most important tactics in air operations during the Korean War. Also, it analyzed the results after a particular city or town had been bombed with incendiaries. As a result, the scientists faced an ethical dilemma separating their mundane work of calculating numbers on desks and the realities of assisting urgent military missions. Operations researchers were well informed that most pilots indiscriminately attacked civilian areas, but continued to aid them by singularly focusing on the notion of efficiency.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (37)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0