메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국동남아학회 동남아시아연구 동남아시아연구 제21권 제3호
발행연도
2011.1
수록면
205 - 243 (39page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper intends to examine why the financial cooperation is prominently advanced and the trade collaboration is stunted in the ASEAN+3 region. Three factors are presented in order to illuminate the main question: institutional frameworks, decision-making of regional leaders and external challenges. Institutional frameworks can be including regional organizations, institutions or multilateral agreements which have primary purposes on economic cooperation since the WTO system was built. In the ASEAN+3 region, the fact that the ASEAN+3 summit became a regularized annual meeting has consolidated the institutional framework in the region. Although the attempt to build the East Asia Economic Caucus was failed, that played a role in the blueprint of ASEAN+3 summit. The legacy has constantly continued as Chiang Mai Initiative Multilateralization. Generally, regional leaders seek the national economic profit to take economic risk aversion. No matter how proper the intention is, it is hard to achieve the regional economic integration if the influence of states and leaders is not considered. It is notable that the ASEAN+3 summit was successfully settled after China, Japan and South Korea positively participated in the meeting. The Asian financial crisis in the late 1990s is a representative economic external challenge on the region. After the crisis, the regional economy was bound together into a financial cooperation, and the regional liquidity fund, named Chiang Mai Initiative, was created as a starting point of regional economic integration. Whereas financial integration developed rapidly in the ASEAN+3 region, there was no remarkable momentum to stimulate the regional trade cooperation. Those three factors does not affect the regional economic integration respectively. Institutional frameworks were based on the economic integration, and decision-making of regional leaders gave the direction of the integration: finance or trade. The external challenge of the Asian financial crisis provides Asian countries with the most significant stimulation, but the importance of the external challenge cannot lessen the influence of two factors in economic integration.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (31)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0