메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국형사법학회 형사법연구 형사법연구 제24권 제4호
발행연도
2012.1
수록면
3 - 45 (43page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This treatise traces the pedigree of normal social rules clause of the Korean criminal Code and evaluates it's legislative significance. The following conclusion has been drawn:The normal social rules clause is not a product of Korean legislator’s independent decision. Instead, it was rather a concept of normal social rules concept employed by Makino who was the representative of the Japanese subjectivism criminal law theory, and his substantial illegality theory based on the normal social rules that Byungro Kim made use of. Makino’s substantial illegality theory was a radical premise which has its basis on the subjectivism theory of criminal law that attempts to retreat the liberty-assuring function of the principle of legality. This theory made the social evolutionary theory widespread in the 19th and early 20th century as its ideological foundation, and the Nazi criminal law also came out of the same chain of such theory. Since the legislative plan of the korean normal social rules clause has been taken a radical natural law-like or radical legal positivism-like methodology, it would be desirable to ultimately abolish this clause. However, even while the normal social rules clause is not being abolished and continues to exist, the details of the normal social rules concept should not be filled by morality nor ethic.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (36)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0