지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
There are some differences in the provisions regarding extension of civil liabilities of director between Framework Act on Cooperatives and Agricultural Cooperative Act (and other Cooperative Acts and Commercial Law, etc). The paper reviews the differences and their legal meanings.
Futhermore, the paper points out that ‘the stipulation extending the Director’s Civil Liabilities in the Framework Act on Cooperatives has several unconstitutional and legally controversial points. Specifically, the article that stipulates that “the director who didn’t express the opposition in a definite manner during the board of directors should be regarded as a director who voted yes on the agenda, and consequently the director should take on the legal joint liabilities for the damages.” has several unconstitutional points, according to the general constitutional theories (like Principle of Proportionality (Principle of Excess Prohibition; Prinzip des Übermaßverbot) and the Principle of Civil Liabilities) that have been established by many legal scholars and judicial precedents.
The paper proposes that Framework Act on Cooperatives should be revised through resolving the inconsistency and the unconstituionality issues. More specifically, the article that stipulates that “the director who didn’t express the opposition in a definite manner during the board of directors should be regarded as a director who voted yes on the agenda” must be revised into the article that stipulates that “the director who was recorded not to raise the issue during the board of directors in the Board of Directors Meeting Minutes should be presumed as a director who voted yes on the agenda” in order to give the director the opportunity to overthrow the legal effect of taking on the legal joint liabilities for the damages by presenting counterevidence during trial.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (29)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0