지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Unfair trading practices related to securities transaction are being regulated by the Capital Market Act, Chapter 4, under the title of ‘restriction on unfair trade’, categorized into three types of insider transaction, market- making, and dishonest transactions. Unfair trading practices damage fairness and transparency in contracting, and deepen distrust of capital market. They are consistently occurring, and their occurrence types are diversified. Accordingly, legislators have regulated a heavy punishment on them regarding them as a serious crime, yet with regard to its enforcement, no acceptable outcome has been made. The reasons for this problem can be found not only in the court's mild weighing of an offense, but also in the procedures of investigating a case of unfair trading practices.
The current investigation system is complex and has the structure where a prosecution is brought only through duplicate processes. As for the structurally problematic investigation procedure, it's most appropriate to form a consultative group combining one integrated deliberation agency and the prosecution as an investigative agency. In addition, the effectiveness of criminal sanction on unfair trading practices lies in protecting investors participating in a stock market for the purpose of investment through the laws about punishment according to the capital market law, and in judging whether it plays the role of defending the society from crimes or not.
To achieve these goals, stronger punishment than the current statutory penalty is being demanded, and as legislative decision corresponding to this, heavy penalty system is being pursued. However, serious criminal punishment is not necessarily effective to suppress crimes. Rather, defining proper penalty for each type of crimes and imposing it clearly will be effective prevention and retribution. For this, the punishment regulations of the capital market law need changes. In other words, they must be revised so that the gain or evaded amount of money from violation may be regarded as the components of a crime and the elements for the assessment of a case, rather than the same kind of crimes are punished differentially depending on the amount of money related to a crime.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (44)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0