지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Sentencing Guideline Committee under the Supreme Court has established a set of guidelines for 15 groups of crimes for the last 4 years and is working on guidelines for additional 8 groups of crimes. Despite the fact that this system has been enforced just for a short time and the guidelines need to be improved in some aspects, it is clear that the guidelines will enhance the transparency and objectivity of sentencing. Recent statistics shows that the courts are rather closely following the given guidelines. Following are the general evaluation and proposals for improvement.
One good thing about the guidelines is their individual and gradual approach,however, various sentencing factors should be more closely considered. Verdicts should include the reasons for the amount of sentence with the unified formats of the statements though the guidelines have no binding force. Furthermore, the guidelines should be restructured according to the principles of criminal law. Standards for fines are needed to be set up as well. Officers working for the guidelines may inevitably have to belong to courts. They should work under the command of the Supreme Court and be changed into full time officers for more efficiency.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (22)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0