지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This is a treatise which analyzed and criticized the attitude of precedents relating to victim-fixing in contempt by collective name(Kollektiv-bezeichnung in German). According to precedents, it can not be a case of contempt in principle when insult is enacted in the manner of collective concept. But precedents say that contempt is exceptionally established when the contents of insulting remarks or expressions come up to all members of the relevant group and, consequently, become to have a negative effect in social evaluation about each person of them. In short, precedents accept contempt when the possibility of violating legal interest(person-value) exists. I agree to this position in principle. By the way, precedents suggest so-called several-elements-perspective as normative criterion to evaluate whether such a possibility exists or not. I think that the perspective has some problems in itself, especially in practice. The most important one is that judgment may be suspected of its appropriateness because of uncertainty of priority-relation between elements in the process of their application.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (22)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0