메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국피해자학회 피해자학연구 피해자학연구 제21권 제1호
발행연도
2013.1
수록면
217 - 244 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Victim Impact Statement(VIS) is a basic right guaranteed by the Constitution (Article 27 Section 5) which aims to provide such victim an opportunity to reflect his or her interest or opinion into the criminal process. As an implementing statute of such right, the Criminal Procedure Law (Section 294-2) sets forth the victims'right to make a statement and such right may be exercised in the course of witness examination process. However, some problems arise: the VIS constitutionally protected is exercised in the way of witness examination; there is a room of infringing on such victim's right because the right to make a statement may be restricted if the victim sufficiently make his or her statement during the witness examination; and, it may be necessary to limit the scope of statement because the victim's statement may negatively influence on the sentencing. In this paper, in order to comply with the purpose of the system of VIS, I make a point and suggest some ways to alleviate those problems mentioned above that:the victim's right to make a statement is a basic right and, thus, its scope should not restricted; and the victim's statement may be made in the closing argument in order to prevent it from influencing on sentencing. Moreover, I think that, in order to handle with the cases where a victim is not satisfied with a sentence, it is necessary to take into account of adopting a system where a victim can participate in the sentencing process more aggressively.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (29)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0