메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국경영법률학회 경영법률 경영법률 제24권 제3호
발행연도
2014.1
수록면
461 - 499 (39page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Under data breach notification law, person or business who owns or licenses data that includes personal information is required to notify the data subject of the breach of the security system of personal information. Since the enactment of California's data breach notification law in 2003, other forty five states of the United States have legislated notification law. Korea adopted data breach notification law under which a personal information controller is supposed to notify the subject of the breach. While Korea's legislation is expected to improve practices of personal information protection, it would be more effective with some amendments. This paper suggests some proposals to improve the operation of data breach notification in Korea. First, publicly available information that is lawfully made available to the general public from government needs to be excluded from the scope of personal information, although its definition is flexible enough to cover new types of sensitive personal information. Second, encryption exemption is necessary so that the controller may not be required to notify the breach if data which includes personal information has been encrypted. It will create incentives to adopt encryption, improving practices of protection, and would alleviate burden on the controller. Third, Korea's legislation should require, in addition to the acquisition of personal information by a third party, an additional element of harm to trigger notification. This additional element will limit unnecessary notification of breach, preventing the subject from becoming desensitized to notification with over-notification.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (19)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0