메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국경영법률학회 경영법률 경영법률 제29권 제1호
발행연도
2018.1
수록면
123 - 155 (33page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper tries an approach to the legal situations regarding the relationships between the appraisal right and synergy generated by the restructuring and the distribution of the latter to the shareholders of the participating companies. It does perform thereby comparings with the legal situations in U.S., Japan and Germany. At first it shows the situation in U.S., in especially in the statutes and common law of the State of Delaware. In furtherance it tried to show that of Japan, introducing and analyzing the recent jurisdictions of Supreme Court and lower courts of Japan. The cases of the former say the relationship between the changes of entire corporate value following the reorganizations and the synergy distribution. At last the author shows the corresponding situations in Germany analyzing the Federal Court Case of ABB, DAT/Altana and Stollwerck. The paper tries in last phase to show the legal frames surrounding the distribution of synergy. It showed as conclusion the followings. There prevails the principle of ‘but-for’ price (nakariseba price) in case of negative synergy. In case of positive synergy there prevails the principle of private autonomy, that is to say, that the agreed merger price becomes fair value, provided that the procedural fairness has been completely confirmed. The courts should be active by the valuation of appraised stocks in case of positive synergy without procedural fairness.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0