메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국경영법률학회 경영법률 경영법률 제24권 제2호
발행연도
2014.1
수록면
271 - 305 (35page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Many countries cross the world have had severe difficulty in financial crisis originated from the United States since 2007. The European Union (hereinafter EU) that is another pillar of the world economy has been also infected with such crisis. In particular, Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece and Spain (hereinafter PIIGS) is at the core of this turbulence in EU. The PIIGS has a major drawback that runs State fiscal deficits. Moreover, the PIIGS has been aggravated by the PIIGS’ poor financial regulations. This means that prudent financial regulations can lessen such deficits and reduce the financial crisis of the PIIGS. The piece examines Spain among the PIIGS and concludes as follows: (1) Specialized banks cannot take deposits from the public in Spain, but they can do in Korea. (2) There is not any express provision of the supervisory and regulatory principle in Korea and Spain. However, such an express provision needs to be provided in the legislations for the legal stability. (3) The minimum capital for banking in Korea is about four times more than that in Spain. (4) In Spain, the Minister of Economy and Finance (hereinafter MEF) decides whether the banking is authorized or not, but another regulations excluding the licensing for banking are excised by another financial regulator, the Bank of Spain (hereinafter BS). On the other hand, one financial regulator, Financial Services Commission (hereinafter FSC) excises all sorts of financial regulations in Korea. (5) There is a preliminary approval process in Korea, but not in Spain. (6) – (7) There are discriminated investment limits and limits of holding bank’s shares based on receivers and shareholders in Korea, but not in Spain. (8) An internal control mechanism is provided in both countries, but the compliance officer is introduced to Korea, not Spain. (9) A prompt corrective action is adopted by Korea, not Spain. (10) Even though an on-site inspection is provided in Korea and Spain, its expansion into other subjects including banks needs to be examined. (11) There are many detailed provisions for the cooperation of the supervisory and regulatory approach in Spain, but not in Korea. (12) While any start-up banking company cannot pay dividends to its shareholders without the BS’s permission for three years, there is any regulation in Korea. (13) Any start-up banking company cannot give credit to its directors for five years in Spain, not in Korea. (14) The BS may send interim directors to so extremely troubled banks in Spain, not Korea. On the other hand, the Korean banking authority can just recommend that the general meeting of any bank dismiss its director from his or her directorship.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (15)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0