메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국경영법률학회 경영법률 경영법률 제24권 제2호
발행연도
2014.1
수록면
403 - 441 (39page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Commercial act art.731 provides that a contract of insurance which covers the death of a third person as an insured event shall require the written consent of the third person at the same time as the insurance contract is concluded. This provision also can be applied if the rights arising from the contract of insurance have been transferred to the person other than the insured, and mutatis mutandis to the designation and change of the beneficiary. A purpose of the legislation is to prevent moral risk, infringement of personal rights, and gambling of insurance contract. Many countries’ insurance contract law adopts this rule but do not enact whether the insured have the power to withdraw the consent or not. According to the common view, it might be interpretated that the insured can withdraw the consent before it gets concluded, but cannot withdraw consent of the concluded contract without the consents of the policyholder and beneficiary. However, the Supreme Court Decision (2011Da81190, 81206 decided on September 14, 2013) reached an opposite conclusion. Only Japanese insurance Act has a provision (§37,) to solve this issue. The writer introduce the content of the concerned provisions and legal issues and expect to lively discussion in our academia

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (45)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0