본 연구의 목적은 복싱클럽 참여자를 대상으로 참여동기가 생활만족에 미치는 영향에 대하여 분석하고, 이를 규명하는데 그 목적이 있다. 본 연구의 대상은 경기도 관내에 있는 복싱클럽에 참여하는 회원 181명으로 하였다. 조사도구는 참여동기를 측정하기 위해 Vallerand, R.J, Pelletier, L.G, Blais, N.M, Senecal, C, Vallieres, E.F등(1992)의 SMS-28(sport Motivation Scale)과 LIM(Leisure Intrinsic Motivation)의 자료를 기초로 정용각(1997), 정선아(2006)가 수정 개발하여 사용한 설문지를 사용하였으며, 생활만족은 Diener, Emmonson, Larson, Griffith(1985)가 개발한 생활만족척도(The Satisfaction with Life Scale : SMLS)를 번안하여 사용한 이종길(1992), 김길섭(2007)이 표준화시킨 5개 문항으로 구성된 설문지를 복싱클럽회원들에게 맞도록 수정ㆍ보완해서 사용하였다. 자료처리는 빈도분석, t-검증, 일원변량분석, 다중선형회귀분석을 실시하였으며, 사후검증은 LSD를 실시하였고, 도출한 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 성별에 따른 참여동기 하위요인 중 무동기에서 유의한 차이가 나타났으며, 연령별에 따른 참여동기 하위요인 중 내적동기와 무동기에서 유의한 차이가 나타났고, LSD 사후검정결과 내적동기와 외적동기에서 10대가 20대 보다 높게 나타났다. 또한 무동기에서는 30대 이상이 20대 보다 높게 나타났다. 둘째, 연령별에 따른 생활만족에서 유의한 차이가 나타났으며, LSD 사후검정결과 10대와 30대 이상이 20대 보다 높게 나타났다. 셋째, 참여동기 하위요인 중 외적동기와 무동기가 생활만족에 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다.
The purpose of this study was to analyze the effects of the participatory motive on the living satisfaction targeting participants in boxing club and to closely examine this. The subjects of this research were set to 181 members who participate in the boxing club where is within the jurisdiction of Gyeonggi Province. As for a research tool, the questionnaire was used that was modified, developed and used by Jeong Yong-gak(1997) and Jeong Seon-a(2006) on the basis of materials in Vallerand et al. (1992)dml SMS-28(sport Motivation Scale) and LIM(Leisure Intrinsic Motivation) in order to measure the participatory motive. As for the living satisfaction, the questionnaire was modified, supplemented and used in line with boxing-club members, which was composed of 5 items, which Lee Jong-gil(1992) and Kim Gil-seop(2007) standardized what was adapted and used The Satisfaction with Life Scale(SMLS), which was developed by Diener, Emmonson, Larson, Griffith(1985). Data processing included frequency analysis, t-test, One-way ANOVA, Multiple Linear Regression Analysis, and post-test. The following are the results, which were elicited after carrying out LSD. First, the significant difference was indicated in non-motive among sub-factors in the participatory motive according to gender. The significant difference was indicated in the internal motive and the non-motive among sub-factors in the participatory motive according to age. As a result of post-test in LSD, the group in their 10s was indicated to be bigger compared to the group in their 20s in the internal motive and external motive. Also, the group in their 30s was indicated to be bigger compared to the group in their 20s in the non-motive. Second, the significant difference was indicated in the living satisfaction according to age. As a result of post-test in LSD, the group in their 10s and 30s was indicated to be bigger than the group in their 20s. Third, the external motive and the non-motive were indicated to have effect on the living satisfaction among sub-factors in the participatory motive.