메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국경영법률학회 경영법률 경영법률 제25권 제1호
발행연도
2014.1
수록면
33 - 67 (35page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In reality, although business transfer and asset transfer perform similar economic roles, asset transfer has been more widely used than business transfer because the former only requires a resolution by the board of directors while the latter, in principle, requires a special resolution at a shareholders meeting under the Commercial Code. Especially, since risks arose from such unsettled concepts as “materiality” and “criticality” in the cases of business acquisition and transfer, corporations avoided M&A by business transfer. As a result, even in some cases when business transfer would be the most appropriate method considering the purpose and motivation, asset transfers were used after disassembling organizations because of the procedural inconvenience and uncertaintyConsidering that the goal of the business transfer method is to “avoid the social and economic cost that may be caused by dis- assembling an organized business into individual assets and transferring the assets and to attempt to maintain the value of the preexisting organization”, disassembling a business to avoid procedural incon- venience would result in a large social economic cost and inefficiency. If an amendment to the Commercial Code which would require a special resolution at a shareholder meeting for an asset transfer of more than a certain size is passed, the imbalance of regulation governing business transfer and asset transfer would be mitigated. In addition, an amendment to the Commercial Code or Enforcement Decree of the Commercial Code that more clearly defines the requirement of “materiality” and “criticality” would increase predic- tability for corporations, which would allow them to take advantage of business transfer at a greater frequency. On the other hand, it is necessary to continue to exert efforts to streamline and integrate the interpretation of the distinction between business transfer and asset transfer under the labor law and corporation law. Moreover, if there is a change in the subject of the personal data processor in the realm of personal data protection, it would be inevitable for the subject of the personal data to exercise certain rights such as withdrawal of consent in this age when the importance of protection of personal data is increasing.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (20)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0