메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국중앙영어영문학회 영어영문학연구 영어영문학연구 제56권 제3호
발행연도
2014.1
수록면
403 - 432 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of the study was three-fold: 1) to analyze vocabulary size in English texts written for the secondary school English curriculum, 2) to examine the effects of 80% vocabulary control on vocabulary size in different sets of textbooks, and 3) to compare vocabulary size between CSATs and textbooks. The study compiled a million word corpus of curricular texts including textbooks, CSATs, and EBS books. RANGE program was used to analyze the vocabulary size and text coverage in the corpus. The results demonstrated that 4,000 to 5,000 words were needed to reach 95% text coverage of curricular texts, which is at odds with the myth that 3,000 words are enough for the school curriculum. The analysis of textbooks showed that a learner is likely to encounter 4,000 words through the textbooks, while acquiring less than 3,000 words if low-frequent words are excluded for consideration. Those 3,000 words were far short of vocabulary size necessary for CSATs, which required more than 5,000 words to reach 95 percent coverage. After all, the vocabulary control movement in the national curriculum produced a large difference in vocabulary size across textbooks, which does not ease the students’ vocabulary learning burden. The paper ends with suggestions for future directions for revision of the vocabulary control in the national English curriculum.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (38)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0