메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국보건정보통계학회 보건정보통계학회지 보건정보통계학회지 제42권 제2호
발행연도
2017.1
수록면
153 - 161 (9page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (1)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Objectives: The purpose of this methodological study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Hemodialysis Self-Management Instrument (HDSMI). Methods: Forward-backward translation was performed to develop the Korean version of the HDSMI. The translated scale was pilot tested and then administered to 215 patients with hemodialysis from January to February, 2016. Construct validity using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and internal consistency reliability were conducted. Results: Through a principal component method of exploratory factor analysis, the original twenty items were analyzed into four factors - problem solving and communication (7 items, 33.8%), fluid and weight control (3, 8.3%), diet and hemodialysis (5, 6.6%), and self-advocacy and emotion control (5, 5.7%), explaining 54.5% of total variance. The four-subscale model was validated by confirmatory factor analysis (χ2/df=2.13, p<0.001, RMR=0.04, GFI=0.86, CFI=0.87, TLI=0.85, RMSEA=0.07). Factor loadings of the four sub-scales ranged from 0.69 to 0.78. Average variance extracted was .80 and construct reliability was 0.94. The Cronbach’s alpha for the total scale was 0.89. Conclusions: The Korean version of the Hemodialysis Self-Management Instrument showed acceptable reliability and validity and can be utilized to assess self-management behaviors of hemodialysis patients in Korea. Additional studies are recommended to continue the psychometric evaluation of self-management scale.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (29)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0