지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The thesis says a study of the replacement possibility about ｢wakeda｣ & ｢hazuda｣ and the semantic relation as ｢wakeda｣ replaces with｢hazuda｣, vice versa. ｢wakeda｣is an expression concluding a definite fact and｢hazuda｣is an expression conjecturing an unrisen or uncertain fact. The two expressions cannot be replaced to do generally, because it’s unnatural if sure judged something is used as conjecture. However, the thesis finds similar cases about the two expressions on the base of assurance. In brief, it’s possible, that the conclusion cases show the conjecture cases. In these cases have the replacement possibility. In case that the relations between P and Q don’t have difference in meaning, ｢ wakeda｣ & ｢hazuda｣ can show from a concluded expression to a conjectured expression. A concluded expression and conjectured expression appear subjective judgements. In case to select anything but the results are same, the two expressions are close in meaning. As ｢wakeda｣&｢hazuda｣is accepted, it’s possible to exchange each other because the two types are close. The concluding a definite fact and the conjecturing an unrisen or uncertain fact are not close expression. Consequently, there are a little bit similarities. The exchange of ｢wakeda｣ & ｢hazuda｣ is characteristic meaning. The exchange of ｢wakeda｣ & ｢hazuda｣ that show causes and results and so on has separate meaning.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (10)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0