메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국근대영미소설학회 근대영미소설 근대영미소설 제16권 제3호
발행연도
2009.1
수록면
23 - 56 (34page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Charlotte Brontë's Jane Eyre has been most repeatedly adapted into films or TV dramas, perhaps due to its popular association with impassioned romantic love of Jane and Rochester. However, it is such a paragon text enmeshed with feminist and (post)colonial issues that it has invited various critical approaches which compete against each other. This paper is interested in how those complicated critical issues of Jane Eyre are figured in and re-interpreted in the contemporary BBC television drama serial adaptations. In the first half of the main body, this study compares the novel with the drama versions point by point on the specific issues of 1) whether the celebrated declaration of female liberty of Jane beginning with "Anybody may blame me who likes..." is included in the drama version, 2) how the female relationships, especially that of mother and daughter, is embodied, and 3) how Bertha, the very person who keeps the key to the mysteries of the novel and the whirls of criticism about the novel, is portrayed. The famous manifesto is mostly wiped out of the drama versions except in that of 1983, and the equally famous dream scene, where the mother-like figure directed Jane to flee from Rochester's temptation, is completely deleted from all versions, while the telepathic communication of Jane and Rochester is unvaryingly included. Therefore, the drama adaptations give priority to the male-female relationship over the relationship among women. As for Bertha, she cannot be said to be completely justified even in the 2006 version, where she is portrayed with deeper psychological depth than the other TV versions. The second part of the main body questions exclusively how the adaptation of 2006 places a high value upon family, the accomplishment of family to be exact, which, in fact, was tacitly disapproved by the author as oppressive to women in a patriarchal society. The so-called "domestic ideology" forces innumerable women not less talented than men to remain in the limited private sphere as an "angel in the house." The portrait of Reed family, which young Jane is mercilessly excluded from, makes it clear that the ultimate task imposed on Jane is to establish her own family in order to be an independent individual. And the portrait of Jane-Rochester family enveloped in the wreathy frame at the end emphasizes Jane's success in accomplishing her goal and at the same time reaffirms the importance of the monogamous family. In conclusion, this paper argues that the conventionalization and containment of critical issues seems to be the inescapable trap even the TV-miniseries adaptations of classic literature, expected to be more 'faithful' to the original than other popular adaptations, fall into despite their recent artistic sophistication.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (12)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0