메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국근대영미소설학회 근대영미소설 근대영미소설 제20권 제2호
발행연도
2013.1
수록면
123 - 140 (18page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper focuses on the way Lawrence treats the closing part of his novel The Rainbow—the last part about the scenes of horse-attack, miscarriage and rainbow. The main argument of this paper is, in the midst of the diverging critical responses about the novel’s ending, to point out that Lawrence’s resolution of the last part is too abrupt and artificial to be regarded as an aporia in a postmodern sense. The above argument is based on Lawrence’s seeming, perilous moral balance that is strongly reflected in his treatment of the ending and his mouthpiece, Ursula’s characterization shown most remarkably in her relationship with her lover Skrebensky. The horse-attack plot and its concurrent miscarriage-event are a good example to show that Lawrence has lost literary control in his somewhat too liberal and individualistic love-vision. His use of the rainbow-symbol as an aesthetic aporia in the end, does not seem very successful, compared to the rainbow potentials in the two previous generations in the novel and compared to the ways that Sons and Lovers or Women in Love ends. The heroine in The Rainbow, Ursula, as well, serves as an interfering element (especially, in her dealing with her lover) in her too egocentric and radical attitude as a liberator of female sexuality. All these in a way prevent the ending of the novel from being a natural flow, merely letting it become a kind of “disruption” in a Formalist sense and also make the reader rethink about Lawrence’ moral vision. This paper is, on the whole, a courageous, Deconstructionist reading of Lawrence’s myth around his novels—especially around The Rainbow.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (19)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0