메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대구사학회 대구사학 대구사학 제106권
발행연도
2012.1
수록면
375 - 400 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper introduced the historicism discourse in the German historian Zunft since 1945. It is characterized by the poverty of philosophical-theoretical reflections which try to relate the historicism with problems of identity of discipline of history and its function. Among most German historians, the historicism has been regarded as negative tradition which the 19th century German historiography left, and as obsolete. They assure that today is the epoch of new discipline of history, that is, modern social history. Recently, some German historian criticized such predominant view. According to them:1. The historicism discourse in the historian Zunft developed undesirably, compared to such discourses in another disciplines of cultural sciences which consider the historicism-problem such as value relativism, which the discipline of history caused, always actual in the modern world. 2. The differences between ‘old’ historicistical discipline of history and ‘modern’ social history has been so overemphasized that it is predominant to suppose that the later surpassed the former. But there is also similarities between them. 3. The social history is also a kind of historicistical discipline of history, because it depends upon the modern concept of history, that is, 'the History' so much as the old form of historical research and historiography. In the same context, a new annalistic model, which tries to surmount the historicism by means of deconstructing the modern concept of history, was suggested.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (34)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0