메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국러시아문학회 러시아어문학연구논집 러시아어문학연구논집 제28호
발행연도
2008.1
수록면
95 - 122 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study tries to show the characteristics of the concepts of contrast through the two contrastive conjucts “зато” and “но” which express concessive meaning. "Зато" contrasts two aspects of an object or two independent situations, in which the undesirable aspects of an objects or situation are followed by the desirable aspect of an object or situation and compensated by them. In many previous works, it was shown that typical "несмотря на" and "хотя” concessive constructions can be replaced by contrastive “но” constructions. But in my opinion it is just analogy caused by regarding two different aspects of "contrast" on the same dimension. Because contrast acts on the different dimensions in concessive constructions and contrastive constructions. In the concessive construtions, the concept of contrast is presented, while in the contrastive constructions, the concept of contrast is asserted. Cause-effect relations in the concessive constructions is based on the topos which is located independently from the linguistic structure and can be decided according to the shared knowledge between speaker and hearers, while cause-effect relations in the contrastive constructions is based on the intra-textual structure and moreover it is decided by speaker's the subjective attitude toward the situations. The reason why, in some cases, contrastive meanings are understanded as concessive meaning is that the concepts of contrast and cause-effect relations which are common elements of both constructions, are considered to act on the same dimension.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (31)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0