메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국러시아문학회 러시아어문학연구논집 러시아어문학연구논집 제40호
발행연도
2012.1
수록면
361 - 389 (29page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Yanokovich administration in Ukraine was expected to have close and friendly relations with the Russian Federation when Yanukovich was elected as president in 2010. This expectation, however, has turned out to be incorrect after two years of the new administration. Yanukovich administration not only has ruined the cooperative relationship with the West, but also has failed to attain the major goals in the relations with Russia such as lowering gas price and ensuring economic support. These disastrous foreign policy outcomes have had many observers wonder whether Yanukovich administration has the clear vision on its foreign policy and is capable to evaluate the objective diplomatic situation which Ukraine faces now. This study evaluates diplomatic courses of each administration of Ukraine after the independence according to the classification of passive balanced diplomacy, active balanced diplomacy, pro-western diplomacy and pro-Russian diplomacy. Then major developments in diplomatic relations with Russia, Europe and the United States during Yanukovich administration are examined and evaluated. Assuming the major reason for an unsuccessful foreign policy of current regime is attributed to the regressive and authoritarian domestic policy, the paper examines how the regressive domestic policy, especially Tymoshen- ko's imprisonment, has made disastrous impacts on foreign policy. The overall unfavorable international situation surrounding Ukraine, along with the fundamental differences in foreign policy goals between Ukraine and Russia are also evaluated. The capability of conducting a wise and optimal foreign policy of Yanukovich administration, including president's personal ability on diplomacy, is far short in dealing with difficult diplomatic situations which Ukraine encounters now. The geopolitical situation of Ukraine and the relatively short history of diplomacy after the independence show that the optimal model for foreign policy for Ukraine is an active balanced policy, which Kuchma's first administration pursued most successfully. It is certain that the best diplomatic course for Ukraine, as of now, is to strengthen the cooperative relationship with the West and at the same time, utilizing this as a leverage, to hold a strong and sovereign position to deal with Russia. However the first step to this course is not easy to take because of weak positon of Yanukovich regime in domestic politics and lack of will to abandon the authoritarian policy. As long as Yanukovich administration holds the current course and fails to improve the relationship with the West, Ukraine is more likely to fall closely into Moscow's orbit. An active balanced foreign policy can be expected during the next administration for which Tymoshenko, Tigopko or Yatseniuk could be contenders.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (26)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0