메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
동방한문학회 동방한문학 동방한문학 제56호
발행연도
2013.1
수록면
327 - 352 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study considers the feature of form and narrative style of Kim Siseup's miscellaneous writings. 'Kim Siseup's Miscellaneous writings' is as long work as it comprisestwo-installments length in a collection of literary works, and also is the prose works that the writer's extensive and profound thoughts embracing Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism are synthetically expressed. As the feature of 'Miscellaneous writings' form, firstly, it mentions the separation of volumes and randomness of its appellation. Through a fact that a correlationship of autocratic content and Q & A of questioner and answerer between chapter and chapter are closely connected, it determines that although each miscellaneous writings of volume.16 and 17 in a collection of works are separated as ten chapters, this is a separation just for a convenience. In addition to this, through a fact that there exist several chapters that the title and content do not correspond, it verifies the title of each chapter is also discretionally denominated just by taking two letters from the forepart. Then, this study considers the narrative style of 'Miscellaneous writings'. 'Miscellaneous writings'is a catechetical prose that all chapters are written in a hypothetical catechetical-technique, and it estimates the acquirable effect from this catechetical narrative style, by analyzing the works on the basis of its narrative style. Specially, 'Miscellaneous writings' has a form that the situation set-up in the introduction and questioner's persuasion in the final part are omitted, and an extremely emphasized discussability on a form, by magnifyingthe answer of Cheonghanja who takes a role to remind, speaking for the writer. But the answerers, a guest and someone, carry out their role as the assistor faithfully, by raising a counterargument against Cheonghanja's opinion, changing a topic by throwing a question or suggesting various subjects. Because this works were written in a catechetical narrative way, it is considered that Kim Siseup could clearly explain the knowledge of sundry materials, effectively encompassing vast subjects.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (5)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0